Tag: Kamala Harris

“Concepts of a plan”

Somehow the debate between Dampnut and Kamala Harris actually went ahead, even though his lordship was supposedly threatening not to do it just a few days ago… and depending on which side you’re on, the general consensus seems to be that Kamala won, it’s just a matter of how; did she just hopelessly outclass him, or did she conspire with ABC and the moderators assigned to the debate to gain an unfair advantage? Predictably, the latter is what I’ve seen a bunch of Trumpeters shrieking on Twitter, because OBVIOUSLY there was no other way she could possibly have outclassed the orange prick in the way she did… but she didn’t even really need to try that hard, cos Trump was perfectly capable of shitting his own bed. At one point he was asked about his healthcare plan:

During the presidential debate Tuesday night, Trump struggled to answer a question about his healthcare plan, accidentally revealing that he didn’t have one at all.
After his particularly lackluster response criticizing Obamacare but giving no alternatives, ABC moderate Linsey Davis asked Trump outright if he knew what he was talking about. “Yes or no, you still do not have a plan?” she said.
“I have concepts of a plan,” Trump replied. “I’m not president right now.”
“But if we come up with something, I would only change it if we come up with something that is better and less expensive. And there are concepts and options we have to do that. And you will be hearing about it in the not too distant future.”

Quite. I don’t know exactly how not-too-distant this future Trump referred to is, but the election is now less than two months away. I think people might want to hear more before then. This should’ve been the takeaway line from the show, of course, but then he had to descend to retelling recent news stories (that have already been debunked) about Haitian immigrants (illegals ones, too, because OBVIOUSLY) stealing and eating people’s cats and dogs. Because this sort of old-school racist bullshit is about all he has.

Anyway, the real sign that Kamala won the debate was this:

YES. TAY TAY’S FINALLY SAID IT. I don’t think anyone would be surprised as her siding with KH, of course,  but it’s kind of nice that she’s finally actually confirmed it. Especially cos it’ll piss Dampnut off.

Needless to say, SOME PEOPLE reacted to this normally:

Christopher Rufo is one of the most godawful people working in conservative American politics these days, so if even HE’s aghast at… whatever the fuck THAT was supposed to be, you should recognise you might have fucked up. But, of course, this is Oolong, not a normal person…

Needless to say Apartheid Clyde agreed with his goons that Trump was hard done by and the moderators were overly harsh on him. But the thing is, Trump is a lying cunt. And if he weren’t a lying cunt, people wouldn’t need to call him out for being a lying cunt. The onus is on him to not be a lying cunt on TV like that. Also, while I’m sure Oolong’s support for Dampnut is sincere, he’s also sucking up to him cos the old bugger’s spoken recently about getting him to head some government efficiency commission, so I presume Oolong’s being all “of course Trump won” so Trump doesn’t forget that idea. Not that it’ll happen anyway, I suspect.

This had better work

After weeks of Biden being told (mostly by the media) to stand down after the debate debacle, and after weeks of refusing to do so… well. Yeah, the election has taken an interesting turn that I’m not sure it really needed, it’s already sufficiently interesting… still, when the donors are threatening to withhold the cash if you don’t fall on your sword, I don’t suppose that leaves you with many options, does it.

Anyway, we now have the prospect of President Kamala Harris in November (not yet set in stone, the convention still has to make it official and there may be other contenders), which, if nothing else, is going to force the New York Times to change its recent tack, which has largely consisted of opinion pieces trying to suck up to Trump by going on about Biden being too old and out of it (as if Trump is neither of those things); now that the evident Democrat contender is nearly two decades younger than the other guy (who is now the oldest presidential candidate ever), they can’t talk about her age in the way they did about Biden’s. Just her gender and her ethnicity (not only is she mixed-race, she’s part Jamaican part Indian! She’s not even part white! How will Nick Fuentes ever cope?), which I’m sure will be enough for the Right once they get over the initial “shit, we have to attack her now instead of the old prick”…

Why do I feel like Will’s mother wishes she could say the same thing about herself? Also, the stepchildren she inherited from her husband don’t exist, apparently? Are kids not real if you didn’t give birth to them? But, frankly, I’m more worried by the Left’s response…

…cos I can see that happening too. I mean, I’m absolutely not a Biden fan and the US’ support for Israel in recent times has been obviously abhorrent, but… the alternative is Trump. People know this. And they’d still vote against Biden. The idea that it might be more important to get the Democrats back in first and THEN hammer them about things like Israel once we’re secure against the cult threat doesn’t seem to occur to them. Trump gets in, things just escalate, and the cult won’t give a fuck about your moral outrage. STOP IT.

Anyway—for better or worse they’ve finally shat and got off the pot, so maybe, just maybe, the Democrats can start putting an effort into actually winning this election. I just hope this is the trick that does it for them after all the discourse…