We’re praying for England (Eng-er-land!)

This was a slightly disconcerting find tonight:

Attributed to Raphael, here’s Jesus coming out of his cage and he’s been feeling ju… er, you know what I mean. I’m not surprised by the depiction of the Son of Man and his fellows as medieval white Europeans, but that thing Jesus is holding is a St George’s Cross. Is Raphael trying to imply that Jesus was English? But at least he woke up the people loitering around his tomb…

…unlike Piero della Francesca’s pack of layabouts. Jesus doesn’t look entirely bright-eyed and bushy-tailed to me either, mind you. And he’s packing the England flag again. I jest somewhat when I call it that, but I do see it occurring in quite a few paintings of him getting out bed that fateful Sunday (I’m only researching it now cos I was looking for something else entirely and somehow happened on the first painting), I see similar things by Botticelli, Bellini, a few others, and I’m just wondering what it’s about… I did find one article suggesting it’s about symbolising Christ’s overcoming of death, but that article also posts some pictures where he’s not carrying a banner at all…

…or, in El Greco’s version, a strategically flapping all-white one (with, apparently, a red cape and a weird square halo)…

…or, in Rubens’ version, an all-red one.

Then there’s this, by Juan Bautista Maino/Mayno, in which Jesus appears to be collecting for the Red Cross or something. I’m particularly fascinated by this because of the bloke who’s about to draw his sword on Jesus: “Didn’t you die last Friday? All right, you pasty undead weirdo, let’s get you back in there permanently…”

To end this post, my own favourite resurrection image:

Where do we start…

So this poor bastard’s heart is evidently breaking that people don’t like the CybertrucKKK and he can’t understand why they don’t. How to improve people’s perception of it? …Hmmmmmm. Well, for a start, maybe make it LESS FUCKING UGLY, perhaps. Make it less of a box, put a bit more curvature in. (Apparently the truck’s famous stainless steel frame means that’s actually quite difficult to do, so… I don’t know, use something else?) I suspect people might also feel better supposed towards it if Tesla could demonstrate it’s actually safer than they’ve been fearing; if you google “cybertruck dangerous”, you get a truly remarkable number of articles wringing their hands over just how dangerous these things might be to pedestrians, cyclists, other vehicles, time and space itself, etc. I don’t see the same sort of fear around other cars. Also, that dickhead Musk has to stop associating with the company so that people won’t associate the truck with him; otherwise the only people actually excited about this fucking monstrosity will continue to be his cultists like the twit who wrote this nonsense in the first place…

The Thirty-Nine Steps

Book #8 for 2024. Oof, we’re not doing terribly well, are we? Another time-consuming project on top of the classical music collection organising has kind of got in the way, but ANYWAY here we are again… Back to 1915 this time round; I’ve seen two film versions (Hitchcock’s famous one and Ralph Thomas’ less famous one) but it’s been so long that my memories of both are dim… on reading the book for the first time, though, I do notice certain differences between it and the films, most notably the lack of female love interest for Hannay which you could evidently get away with in a 1915 magazine serial but not in a 1935 film. Anyway, our hero Richard Hannay is newly returned home from the dark continent, and London life is boring him; yearning for excitement, a chance meeting provides just that, dropping him in among international intrigue, but he soon finds the true story is a lot bigger than he originally thought. The book is basically kind of a rewrite of the outbreak of a certain war that was going on when it was written, and I don’t think it’s too big of a spoiler to say that Hannay’s efforts don’t stop it from breaking out in the end; the story relies on a few too many coincidences in place of plot development, characterisation is somewhat negligible, and the literary style is kind of blunt. But that does work in the book’s favour; it compresses a surprising amount into a fairly small span and it keeps your attention all the way through, and you want to see how Hannay gets out of the various scrapes he gets into (and where he finds time to breathe in the course of one damn thing after another happening). Can’t exactly call it a literary masterpiece, and that’s fine; solid proto-pulp adventure has its own valid place too, and a bit of B-film vigour never hurts…

Can’t buy a lawsuit

Oolong’s lawsuit against that org documenting racist and extremist content on Twatter just got tossed:

A judge in California on Monday dismissed tech billionaire Elon Musk’s lawsuit against the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a non-profit that has published reports chronicling the rise of racist, antisemitic and extremist content on X, formerly Twitter, since Musk’s acquisition.
The case was dismissed in accordance with the state’s anti-Slapp law, which forbids nuisance lawsuits intended to punish the exercise of free speech.
“Sometimes it is unclear what is driving a litigation, and only by reading between the lines of a complaint can one attempt to surmise a plaintiff’s true purpose,” wrote Charles Breyer, the US district judge, in the ruling. “Other times, a complaint is so unabashedly and vociferously about one thing that there can be no mistaking that purpose. This case represents the latter circumstance. This case is about punishing the defendants for their speech.”

This was a pretty bullshit case from the off and the judge. Alas that it almost certainly won’t make any difference to the amount of “racist, antisemitic and extremist content” on the platform, not if the amount of that sort of shit which I’ve been reporting lately and getting nothing but “chinlesswonder1488 hasn’t broken our safety policies” type replies is indicative…

Oh… THAT’s where she’s been

So, as you may have noticed, I’ve had practically nothing to say about the Kate Middleton “mystery” beyond alluding to it in that post about Tucker Carlson getting pranked by those Youtubers. But we now have an answer to the mystery, and, yeah, it’s not great

In January, I underwent major abdominal surgery in London and at the time, it was thought that my condition was non-cancerous. The surgery was successful.
However, tests after the operation found cancer had been present. My medical team therefore advised that I should undergo a course of preventative chemotherapy and I am now in the early stages of that treatment.
This of course came as a huge shock, and William and I have been doing everything we can to process and manage this privately for the sake of our young family. As you can imagine, this has taken time.
It has taken me time to recover from major surgery in order to start my treatment. But, most importantly, it has taken us time to explain everything to George, Charlotte and Louis in a way that is appropriate for them, and to reassure them that I am going to be OK.

I was just a couple of weeks short of 33 when my mum told me about hers. It was awful enough news at that age, it’s not going to be any easier for Kate to do it. I may have no particular use for the royal family but I don’t wish this sort of thing on her. I must say I’m a little shocked, though, at the idiocy of some of the responses to the news…

…such as the sort of self-righteousness and huffiness displayed by this bullshit. Sorry, but “the Internet” had nothing to do with it, this was a PR failure from the start by the family’s PR people. As soon as the conspiracy nonsense started on social media, the onus was on THEM to do something to quiet the bullshit down. Obviously it wouldn’t have had any effect on the real dickheads on Twitter, but I think if they’d just said something like she was still recovering from that abdominal surgery, or receiving further treatment after it, the majority of us who aren’t completely divorced from reality would’ve been OK with that. The family’s failure to say anything, however vague and anodyne, just gave the psychotics room to run rampant. I do find it quite odd that both her and Charles were both found with cancer after having other work done on them, but I don’t see any reason to assume anything other than coincidence at work. Unlike some people:

This isn’t the worst of these cunts I’ve seen, I saw one on Twitter saying that even the cancer news is disinformation and Kate is in fact dead… but the real problem, apparently, is… Meghan Markle?

When it comes to the British monarchy’s internecine battles, I’ve no doubt that neither side is exactly “good”, but I’ve even less doubt that racism underlies a lot of the hatred of Meghan Markle who has the temerity to be a mixed-race American unlike those 100% ethnically pure and stainless übermenschen of the Windsor family. Indeed, I saw a post on Twatter that I unfortunately can’t find now saying Meghan effectively gave Kate cancer cos of the stress of their relationship reducing her immune system and making her more prone to it. Seriously, when the antivax ghouls aren’t the worst responders to news of this sort… oy.

But the stupidest response I’ve seen so far is actually one made to that tweet by Jo Woods I put up earlier:

I think it’s quite impressive to listen to her ACTUALLY SAY in the video that cancer was found in the post-operative tests and interpret that as “she doesn’t have cancer”. Like she’s doing chemo for shits and giggles rather than to make sure any cancer that might still be there doesn’t go any further. And I not only read the statement, I listened to her say the words herself. Honestly. I probably shouldn’t be as surprised as I am by some of the discourse about this news, and yet somehow things can be too silly even for me to predict…

Candace Go-wens

That is probably the worst pun I’ve ever produced, but fortunately the occasion for it is better:

Ben Shapiro’s conservative media empire has cut ties with Candace Owens, amid a lengthy public feud between the far-right pundit and her bosses over the Israel-Hamas war.
“Daily Wire and Candace Owens have ended their relationship,” Shapiro’s co-founder Jeremy Boreing tweeted on Friday morning. “The rumors are true—I am finally free,” Owens posted to her own X account. Representatives for The Daily Wire and Owens did not immediately respond to requests for additional comment. […]
Shapiro had often come to the defense of Owens’ rhetoric, but following the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, the pair began a very public battle that at one point featured the Daily Wire co-founder daring his star podcaster to quit.
The feud began last November when Owens tweeted that “no government anywhere has a right to commit a genocide.” While she did not specifically mention the State of Israel, her remarks were widely condemned by her fellow conservative media figures. Soon after, Shapiro publicly called Owens’ behavior “disgraceful” and chided her “faux-sophistication” on the Israel-Hamas conflict. […]
But the Daily Wire in-fighting appeared to reach its final stage this week when Owens liked a social-media post asking conservative rabbi Shmuley Boteach whether he is “drunk on Christian blood again”—an overt reference to the antisemitic “blood libel” canard that has regained popularity on the far-right via QAnon. (Days earlier, Owens dabbled in other antisemitic tropes by suggesting there’s a Jewish “gang” in Hollywood.)

So it appears she’s been engaging in some proper antisemitism other than just not being pro-Israel. Well, as I’ve said before, Shapiro insisted on hiring her and keeping her in full knowledge of what she said about Hitler being OK; I’m wondering who finally made the call, though, cos Jeremy Dullard made the announcement and Shapiro doesn’t appear to have said anything about it. Shame it ended like this, eh? They were cunts of a feather who thoroughly deserved each other…

Maybe don’t do that?

Seen on Bluesky:Oh dear. I don’t describe myself as a “queer ally”—I only say that I do my best to be one—cos I am entirely in sympathy with queer folk that say non-queer folk don’t get to call themselves that, it’s something the queer community should judge… but I have some idea of how to be an ally to said community and, um… I’m fairly sure this isn’t the way. I mean, Pride is something I’ve previously discussed, and I’m personally meh about it, but… it’s not about the allies. I know that much. This appears to be where the above screenshot comes from, though I find it a bit odd that Marvel’s own website doesn’t say anything about “pride allies” and credits an entirely different artist. Whatever, though, I think people will just be glad that Rob Liefeld’s not doing it…

Probably not

Spotted this on Tumblr, an ad for the Rosicrucians published in something called The Occult Digest in the early 1930s. All I can say, if I were an enslaved god, I’d be pretty piss-poor as a god if I let myself become enslaved like that…

Is he even technically walking on water?

So, someone posted this on Bluesky because, well, clearly they’d decided that if they had to see it then so should everyone else, and in the same spirit I post it here. When I first looked at this… thing, I literally said “what the…?” out loud, cos what else was there to say about it? Jesus dragging some young Asian girl through apparently ankle-deep rainwater while a bus being driven by an apparently disproportionately small driver bears down upon them (while someone just stands there capturing the action on their phone)? That fucking thing’s uncomfortably close even for the Son of Man… and it’s got Jesus as its destination, too, so how determined is it to hit him? Meanwhile Jesus is apparently carrying his own lower body in his other hand while still running with it…?

I looked at it again and said “what the…?” again, cos I didn’t know what else to say.

And then I saw just how many legs Jesus was carrying. I think that may have broken me just a little. Maybe Islam has a point about prohibiting depictions of Muhammad…