Cumberland blue

Nice to be able to report that Cumberland City Council undid a bit of stupidity it enacted last week:

A controversial ban on same-sex parenting books at libraries in part of western Sydney has been overturned at a marathon late-night meeting after large crowds of protesters clashed outside the council chambers.
Cumberland city councillors voted 13-2 in front of a crowded public gallery on Wednesday night to revoke the ban, two weeks after it was introduced.
The council’s u-turn followed a widespread backlash and a warning from the NSW government that Cumberland risked losing its library funding.
Councillors narrowly voted on 1 May to “take immediate action to rid same-sex parents books/materials in council’s library service”. During the meeting, the councillor who put forward the motion, former mayor Steve Christou, brandished a book he alleged had received “really disturbing” constituent complaints, saying parents were “distraught” to see the book, A Focus On: Same-Sex Parents by Holly Duhig, displayed on a shelf in the children’s section of the library.
At a fiery meeting on Wednesday, Christou attempted to have same-sex parenting books restricted to the adults’ section of the library.
When that failed, his Our Local Community party colleague Paul Garrard tried to have the same restriction placed just on Duhig’s book.
Ultimately, all but two councillors supported a motion put forward by Labor’s Kun Huang to reverse the ban and ensure all books were catalogued according to national library guidelines, including having Duhig’s book in the junior non-fiction section.
Eddy Sarkis was the only councillor who supported Christou.
Labor councillor Mohamad Hussein, who had voted for the ban originally, changed his vote at the last minute. Hussein declined to comment when asked by journalists why he had changed his mind.

Notably, the 15 council members who voted tonight were more numerous than those who voted for the ban, cos there were only 11 councillors there that time. Almost like Christou, a far-right shit of several years’ standing, was exploiting the other four’s absence to make it easier to push his ban through or something. Anyway, the grand plan came undone and a bit of sense prevailed for once; Christou succeeded in getting drag queen story time events banned at Cumberland libraries despite the fact that none were planned and none had indeed ever happened in the first place, so I quite like seeing him be told to go fuck himself in this fashion.

Shannon Molloy at News, on the other hand, had an interesting take on the affair; after describing a couple of books full of horrors, he makes this “shocking” revelation:

I’m talking about the Bible and the Quran, of course.
If we’re applying Cumberland City councillor Steve Christou’s same logic about what’s appropriate in a library, then surely those holy books have to go too.
Mr Christou’s opposition to a book about kids with two mums or two dads was to prevent the “sexualisation” of children.
The book in question isn’t remotely sexual. It’s about families.
If Mr Christou is really, truly concerned about the welfare of children and saving them from content that’s inappropriate, he mustn’t waste any time.
He should immediately call a vote of the council and push for the removal of the Bible and Quran from Cumberland’s libraries.
To not do so would expose shocking double standards, which I’m sure he doesn’t hold.
Of course, I’m being facetious.
I’m gay, but I’m also a Christian with a deep fondness for the teachings of Christ. I’m in favour of the freedom of religious practice, no matter the brand of one’s faith.
But the metaphor I’ve used here shows how absurd and hypocritical Mr Christou and the council’s book ban is.
It also demonstrates that censorship – which flies in the face of an open and free society and the democratic values we hold dear – is a very slippery slope.

I don’t know why, but I feel like brother Shannon wouldn’t actually be that bothered if the Qur’an did get pulled from libraries…

Anyway, according to Leo Puglisi on Twitter (yes, I KNOW what I said in the last post; I saw this bit earlier before it went to shit), the book in question has apparently been borrowed ONCE in the five or so years that it’s been in the Cumberland library system. It’s so dangerous that hardly anyone’s read it… and, funnily enough, Steve Christou himself had to admit to being among its millions of non-readers. Because OBVIOUSLY. The only thing I worry about in all this is that the silly cunt might look at all this bullshit and decide he needs to up his homophobia game. Or maybe he’ll just go back to racism. I don’t want to say anything more in case I give him ideas.

Worth a thousand words?

Gina Rinehart demands National Gallery of Australia remove her portrait

The mining billionaire Gina Rinehart has demanded the National Gallery of Australia remove her portrait from an exhibition by the award-winning artist Vincent Namatjira.
The image, arguably an unflattering picture of Australia’s richest woman, is one of many portraits unveiled at the Canberra gallery as part of the Archibald prize-winning artist’s first major survey exhibition.
The National Gallery has rebuffed efforts to have the picture taken down and said in a statement that it welcomed public dialogue on its collection and displays.

I can’t say that I don’t entirely see Gina’s point, cos it’s really not flattering to her… but by the same token she’s also one of the worst people in Australia, so we may ask if she deserved a flattering portrait in the first place.

Talking of portraits…

 

…Chuckles has unveiled his, and… it’s… red?

Jonathon Yeo was chosen to do the portrait – he’s done paintings of lots of other famous figures, including Sir David Attenborough and Malala Yousafzai.
The artist said he wanted to make a break with the past. This means he wanted to paint something slightly different to other, more traditional paintings of monarchs.
This is why he used a bright red colour throughout the painting.

The portrait seems to have drawn mixed reviews (though his kingship seems satisfied with it). I… kind of like it? I suspect my mum would’ve hated it, but I do think it’s interesting at least. However, Nigel Farage says he likes it too, so I don’t know how to feel about that…

I wonder why

Rudy Giuliani struggles to find an accountant: ‘nobody seems interested’

“Nobody seems interested” in helping Rudy Giuliani meet accounting obligations in his ongoing bankruptcy case, lawyers for the former New York mayor, presidential hopeful and Trump attorney said in a court filing on Tuesday.
“Unfortunately, the debtor originally had an accountant who was helping,” the filing said. “However, he had a change of heart and indicated that he no longer wished to help prepare the monthly operating reports.
“The debtor advised that he has reached out to a number of accounting firms and CPAs seeking their help, however, no one seems interested in taking the assignment.”

I feel it’s not so much that they’re not interested in the job as such, but more that they’re interested in being paid for it, and they don’t trust Rudy to do so so they have enough sense to not get involved… unlike the man himself, who persists in working for Trump despite the latter owing him millions in legal fees.

Lock him up, for fuck’s sake

There’s nothing I’ve really wanted to say about the Orange One’s legal woes, cos I prefer to have as little to say about him as possible, but there was an interesting development in the hush money trial:

So Trump keeps violating the gag order that’s been put on him by pissing and moaning on Truth Social, and there’s been a lot of discourse about why he isn’t in jail for it. Cos, you know, like everything else about Trump’s legal situation, ANYONE ELSE would’ve been in jail ages ago… anyway, though, Judge Merchan has finally raised the spectre of Orange Man having to wear the orange suit. So this is quite a move forward.

At least it will be if Merchan actually takes it; while noting that the $1000 fines he applied to each of the nine times he’s been allowed to violate the gag order have been useless as a deterrent, on the tenth violation he just fined him the thousand bucks again. And he’s said outright he doesn’t actually want to jail Trump either, all of which kind of begs the question: at what point does Merchan actually intend to consider the jail option? And when he does consider it, will he actually pack Trump off to a cell? Cos, obviously, ANYONE ELSE, like I said, would’ve been in one long before this. Amazing what leniency you can purchase just by having been president…

That’s not how you do this…

I’ve seen a fair bit of discourse about how Joe Biden’s presidential chances will be affected by his responses, or lack thereof, to Israel’s ongoing hammering of Palestine, and people saying they won’t vote for him because of that. This, however, goes to a new and even stupider place:

Oy. Let’s break this down. The worst possible election outcome is Trump, right? I think Lena will agree with me there. And if people don’t vote for Biden, that is what they will get. There isn’t a third option. And “burning it all down” is a nice thought, but only if you have something better to build over the ashes. Which, currently, you do not have. You have Biden or Trump; you don’t have a great socialist revolution waiting in the wings to be better than either of them. Again, no third option. And Palestine’s not going to be any better off under Trump. And, frankly, look what Republican governors are doing without a Republican president, then imagine what they’ll get away with if Trump’s running the show.

As for Lena’s rights… well, FUCK her rights if she’s willing to give them up that easily. But it’s not her rights that she’s willing to give up in the interests of taking a firm stand, of course, it’s everyone else’s. It’s a decision she’s willing to make on their behalf. It’s a decision she’s made already, indeed. And if she’s willing to give up her rights in the interests of sending a strongly worded message to Joe Biden, she probably deserves to… it’s the ones who’ll lose their rights without deserving to I’m more worried about.

Oh the irony

Amazing. After introducing laws requiring photo ID at polling booths (which, ironically, he was violently opposed to when he was a journalist two decades earlier; amazing what becoming PM does to you), de Pfeffel forgot to bring his. All he had to do was go home and get it and come back, which he did, but I imagine he was fuming while he did so, cos EVERYONE would’ve known it was him anyway but they had to uphold the rules cos he introduced them. The world political situation is so vile at the moment that I’ll happily take even a small moment of levity from it…

Oh the optics

So the black grandson of South Africa’s arguably most famous black person just had his Twitter account suspended. You know, Twitter, the company by that white South African character who evidently has little if any idea how this is going to make him look, and how little this is going to change perceptions of him as a racist shithead. Well done.

Sad!

Another professional liar looks like going down:

The Gateway Pundit, the notorious far-right blog and prolific publisher of conspiracy theories, said Wednesday that it had filed for bankruptcy protection as it grapples with litigation related to its coverage of the 2020 election.
The move comes as the staunchly pro-Donald Trump website, which promoted the false notion that the 2020 election was stolen by President Joe Biden and his allies, faces multiple lawsuits over its bogus claims.
One of the lawsuits, filed by two former Georgia election workers, Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, accuses The Gateway Pundit of publishing stories that falsely accused them of election fraud, which the pair said prompted a wave of harassment and threats of violence. The judge has rejected several attempts to throw out the case, which is currently in the discovery phase ahead of a potential trial.
Another lawsuit, filed by former Dominion Voting Systems executive Eric Coomer, accuses the outlet of defamation. A Colorado appeals court ruled earlier this month that Coomer’s sweeping case can proceed toward trial against Gateway Pundit and several other prominent defendants.

Heart: not bleeding. Gateway Pundit has a string of bullshit news stories to its (dis)credit and a bunch of lawsuits already behind it as well. Fuck Jim Hoft and his cast of hate-spewing maggots, I won’t miss them if this forces them out of business.

In fact it’s a gas

House conservatives have a special group dedicated to preserving their power. Of course, it’s called the FART team.

No, really, that’s what it’s called. The Floor Action Response Team. FART.

Mind you, this isn’t the first time they’ve had trouble naming things according to Wiki:

The caucus originated during the mid–January 2015 Republican congressional retreat in Hershey, Pennsylvania. According to founding member Mick Mulvaney, “that was the first time we got together and decided we were a group, and not just a bunch of pissed-off guys”. Nine conservative Republican members of the House began planning a new congressional caucus separate from the Republican Study Committee and apart from the House Republican Conference. The founding members who constituted the first board of directors for the new caucus were Republican representatives Scott Garrett of New Jersey, Jim Jordan of Ohio, John Fleming of Louisiana, Matt Salmon of Arizona, Justin Amash of Michigan, Raúl Labrador of Idaho, Mulvaney of South Carolina, Ron DeSantis of Florida and Mark Meadows of North Carolina.
At the retreat in Pennsylvania, the group settled on the name Freedom Caucus. Mick Mulvaney told Ryan Lizza of the New Yorker, “We had twenty names, and all of them were terrible. None of us liked the Freedom Caucus, either, but it was so generic and so universally awful that we had no reason to be against it.” According to Lizza, “one of the working titles for the group was the Reasonable Nutjob Caucus.”

As far as bunches of fucking deadshits go, this clown car certainly is one. The fundamental unseriousness of these people is stunning.