The hell, you say

Can’t imagine why Nick Fuentes felt the need to post this. Almost like he thinks someone might blame him for what happened to Charlie Kirk or something. Why would he do that, I wonder. Surely nothing to do with him being a neo-Nazi and Chuckles apparently having beef with neo-Nazis for years… don’t understand why cos he seems to have believed many of the things they do, maybe he saw them as competition? I don’t know. Just weird how Nick’s distancing himself from this guy like that when I’m sure he would be delighted for this sort of thing to happen to someone not on his side.

In actually shocking news…

Trump acknowledges losing the 2020 election ‘by a whisker’ …Hang on, WHAT?

Former President Donald Trump publicly acknowledged that he did not win the 2020 presidential election, telling podcaster Lex Fridman that he “lost by a whisker.”
Fridman asked the Republican nominee about his expectations for his debate next week against Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee, in a podcast episode released Tuesday.
Trump initially answered, “I’ve done a lot of debating … I’ve done well with debates,” before embarking on a tangent about the number of votes he received in 2020, saying: “I became president. Then the second time I got millions more votes than I got the first time.”
“I was told if I got 63 million, which is what I got the first time, ‘You would win. You can’t not win.’ And I got millions more votes than that and lost by a whisker,” Trump added.
Trump received about 74 million votes nationally in 2020, compared to 81 million for Joe Biden.
His admission is a departure from his usual rhetoric about the 2020 presidential election results, which he often claims were “rigged.”

I mean, that’s not really a “whisker” as such, but that’s not the important thing, which is that Trump just acknowledged having lost the 2020 election after years of claiming it was stolen and legal issues surrounding the matter. He apparently went back to the fraud story later in the interview, but too late, the damage was done, and OH that’s going to have some ramifications for his ongoing court strife. And Nick Fuentes is PISSED:

Fuentes noted that if Trump knows that he lost the 2020 election, then he “deserves to be charged” by special counsel Jack Smith for his efforts to overturn the results of the election.
“That actually vindicates the DOJ charge against him!” Fuentes declared. “Because the charge is that he knew he lost but he lied to defraud the people.”
“So, why did we do Stop the Steal?” Fuentes demanded to know. “Why did anyone go to Jan. 6? Why is anyone sitting in jail? Why did anything bad happen to anybody? Why did everyone get censored? Why is everything bad that has happened to the people that were involved, why did that need to happen if you’re just going to walk it all back and say, ‘Oh, I lost’?”
“Well, it would have been good to know that before 1,600 people got charged,” he continued. “It would have been good to know that before I had all my money frozen, [was] put on the No Fly List, [got] banned from everything, lost all banking and payment processing. It would have been good to know that before I, in 2017, dedicated my life to this as an 18 year-old in college. It just feels like a big ripoff.”
“It just goes to show what a tremendous betrayal it is,” Fuentes said. “It’s just such a callous indifference to the sacrifices that his supporters made on his behalf.”

Poor Nick. Daddy let you down so much. I’d feel sorry for you if you weren’t you.

And the worst of it is, I don’t think Trump actually meant to make that admission. It just slipped out of him cos he can barely put a coherent thought together any more. It’s not even like Lex Fridman was trying to coax that out of him or trip him up, Dampnut tripped himself up without any help… and, more to the point, I suspect that he never even noticed. Not only did he not mean to say it, he wasn’t even aware that he did say it… I don’t think going back to calling it a fraud later in the interview was an attempt to walk the statement back cos he didn’t even know he’d said it. I’ll admit it, I never used to like the line of attack suggesting Trump has mental issues, cos if someone is a titanic piece of shit I feel like ascribing a medical reason potentially gives them a way to diminish their responsibility for that. And I’m always a bit wary of diagnosis from a distance with this sort of thing… but in Trump’s case it’s getting harder and harder to ignore.

Do these people really not get it?

I spotted this online earlier today:

Of course the real question is, are there any 16 year old girls out there with low enough self-esteem that they’d even think about being in the same room as this Nazi incel, let alone actually marrying the thing? Also, really, does he think that this will do anything to convince the people who think he’s gay that he isn’t? “Ergh, you’re a FAAAAAG!” “No I’m not, I’m into underage girls!” “That’s… not actually better, man…”

Anyway, I had no idea where this interesting statement was sourced from (I didn’t recognise the design, which I now realise is what his Telegram channel looks like), so in the interests of fairness I thought I should make sure someone wasn’t putting words in his mouth… and, well, they weren’t; this is the original Telegram post (get it quick in case he has the sense to delete it), while Mediaite offers a possible explanation for why he asked the question in the first place:

“Here I am, like, hey listen, guys. You turn 21, you find yourself a 16-year-old bride, you go crazy. You go crazy: no condoms, no snips, no abortions, no pills, no none of that. That’s the most pro-sex position there is,” Fuentes said on his podcast.
“Anyway, so that’s, anyway, so that’s where I’m at with that.”
After an awkward six-second pause, Fuentes continued.
“And, uh, yeah, I gotta find, I gotta find my 16-year-old wife. Probably when I turn 30 or something. Cause here’s the thing: I don’t wanna be like, let’s say I get married to an 18-year old now. Six year age difference. When I turn 40, she’s going to be 34. Ew.
“But if I’m 30 and she’s 16 to 14 year age difference. When I’m 50 she’ll be 36. When I’m 40, she’ll be 26. And now we’re talking here, now we’re cooking with gas. Now you can see an alternative vision for how things can be. If only you knew how different things could be.”

Oy. I mean… I suppose it’s worth something that he’s open to the idea of her getting older, that he can apparently live with his jailbait lover being in her mid-thirties one day rather than replacing her every so often with a series of other 16 year olds… but still. If he’s too stupid to realise just how wrong this is, I don’t know how much of a beating you’d have to administer to him to make him realise…