I suppose that’s a cheaper solution…

Fox “News” hosts really hate people:

LAWRENCE JONES (FOX HOST):  We don’t have to — we feel so compassionate because you see the mental health crisis happening.
AINSLEY EARHARDT (FOX HOST): You just get — exactly.
JONES  But it’s not our job — we shouldn’t have to live in fear while they figure out what is going on right there.
EARHARDT: Right, right.
JONES: Put him in a mental institution, put him in a jail, and you guys figure it out. But people having to duck and dive on the trains and the buses, walking through the street, this is one case, but this is happening all across the country, and it’s not a money issue. They have given billions of dollars to mental health and the homeless population. A lot of them don’t want to take the programs, a lot of them don’t want to get the help that is necessary. You can’t give them a choice. Either you take the resources that we’re going to give you and — or you decide that you are going to be locked up in jail. That’s the way it has to be now.
BRIAN KILMEADE (FOX HOST): Or involuntary lethal injection.
JONES: Yeah.
KILMEADE : Or something. Just kill them.
EARHARDT: Yeah, Brian, why did it have to get to this point?

And she didn’t ask that question in the sense of “what the fuck is wrong with you, you psychotic cunt?”, which is the question a normal person would ask if someone said the homeless deserve death for doing bad things. (By “involuntary lethal injection”, no less. What an idea to just… you know, leap to.) But these are not normak people, these are Fox hosts, and Kilmeade is a particularly vile example. I wonder if he imagines this as a general solution to the homelessness problem… you know, can’t have homelessness without homeless people…

But remember: it’s left-wing rhetoric that causes violence in America. Obviously.

I’m sure they’ll come around to the idea, though

DHS Slams Report on Citizenship Reality Show Pitch, Calls Daily Mail Story ‘False’

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is pushing back strongly against a widely circulated Daily Mail report that claimed the agency and its Secretary, Kristi Noem, were involved in a proposed reality TV show that would allow immigrants to compete for American citizenship.
The story, which stirred controversy online, alleged that DHS had entertained a pitch for a show titled The American, produced by Rob Worsoff — a veteran of unscripted television with credits including Duck Dynasty, Alpha Dogs, and The Millionaire Matchmaker. According to the Daily Mail, Secretary Noem had even “backed” the show, which would reportedly feature immigrants participating in challenges across the country, ranging from civic quizzes to physical tasks, for a shot at U.S. citizenship.
In a statement released Friday, DHS refuted the article, dubbing it “Fake News Friday” and accusing the Daily Mail of pushing a “media hoax.” The department said unequivocally that Secretary Noem was neither involved in, nor even aware of, the show’s pitch.

So news about this putative show broke yesterday, and I think the general reaction online was basically “this is fucked up but also in character for TrumpCorp”. Cos let’s face it, a reality show contest for this sort of thing is EXACTLY the sort of thing this hideous regime should be into, it’s an idea that speaks Mushroom Cock’s language. And the idea was perfectly real:

In an interview with the New York Times, Worsoff, a Canadian-born producer who is now a naturalized U.S. citizen, confirmed that the reality series idea was very real. He emphasized that the show was intended as a celebration of the immigrant experience, not a punitive spectacle.
“We need a national conversation about what it means to be American,” Worsoff told the paper. “We need to be reminded of how proud and how much of an honor it is to be American. We’re going to get to know these people and their stories and their journeys, and we’re celebrating them as humans.”
According to a pitch deck reviewed by both the Times and the Daily Mail, the show would be called The American. Contestants would participate in various challenges focused on U.S. civics and history, with the winner being granted citizenship. Importantly, Worsoff noted that contestants who did not win would not be penalized or deported.

Glad that he clarified that last point, because you can’t trust TrumpCorp not to do that. Indeed, if the regime were to actually come on board with this atrocity—and, whatever their protestations now, I wouldn’t be surprised if they wound up actually doing something like this—I can easily imagine them making it a punitive affair. Cos the US right now is not even remotely about celebrating immigrants, unless they’re white South Africans…

And which of these are we looking at here?

Oh Guardian, this was poorly chosen. What we’re actually looking at here is “American artist, community activist, and perennial candidate” Paperboy Prince at the New York City Mayoral Candidates Forum at Medgar Evers College, being hauled off the stage for protesting that he was a mayoral candidate but wasn’t allowed to speak at the forum. I don’t know the merits or otherwise of the case, but… well, when you use the headline “Holocuast Remembrance Day and mourners at the Vatican” for your photo section and then illustrate it with this picture of some dude in clown makeup, you’ve made a choice. And you should probably regret it. And lose your job for it.

Slightly less shocked

Well, the Atlantic just published all the messages from that little group chat Jeffrey Greenberg got invited into…

This Signal message shows that the U.S. secretary of defense texted a group that included a phone number unknown to him—Goldberg’s cellphone—at 11:44 a.m. This was 31 minutes before the first U.S. warplanes launched, and two hours and one minute before the beginning of a period in which a primary target, the Houthi “Target Terrorist,” was expected to be killed by these American aircraft. If this text had been received by someone hostile to American interests—or someone merely indiscreet, and with access to social media—the Houthis would have had time to prepare for what was meant to be a surprise attack on their strongholds. The consequences for American pilots could have been catastrophic.

Indeed. If we assume that all of this stuff is accurate and Mike Waltz did in fact invite Goldberg into the cast, then the question still stands as to why and what did he think was going to come of him doing so, cos I doubt somehow he was expecting this (following image ganked from Bluesky):

That’s Laura Ingraham from Fox News, by the way. Even this fucking far-right hack and Mushroom Cock cultist couldn’t believe this bullshit. And as others have said online, if Waltz is right about Goldberg hacking into the chat, that actually makes it worse, cos that’s him tacitly admitting the chat was hackable… and, frankly, that means it could’ve been hacked by one of those “hostile” forces. What an entire shitshow. I don’t have any more words for what I feel about it all, so I’ll just post a couple of other folks’ statements that I agree with:

Radio wall of sound (and fury)

Apparently the BBC is reformatting a bunch of its programming, particularly the radio drama, and, well, people are getting the vapours about it. This Graun piece suggests that, yeah, people are complaining cos killing off the last drama program on Radio 3 looks bad, but it’s probably less bad than it looks:

In 2021, BBC Radio revamped the bulk of its arts programming, the greatest casualty being Saturday Review on Radio 4. Outcry followed, as today. Yet Radio 4’s other arts coverage was commensurately bulked up, with the addition of new shows This Cultural Life and Screenshot. Radio 4’s highest-profile arts offering, Front Row, has gained 30 minutes a week and a weekly slot focused on Scottish arts. Meanwhile, Radio 3’s forthcoming programming, notably a 40-part series on modernism in music, shows a commitment to classical but no sign of dumbing down.
What lies behind this shift, I am told, is the director general Tim Davie’s obsession with “brand purity”. Gone is the magazine mix of Radio 3, with its mandate to balance highbrow speech programming with highbrow music; we are moving instead to the “clarity” of a Radio 3 dedicated to classical and jazz music, and a Radio 4 dedicated to speech. Speech programmes that enhance Radio 3’s “music brand”, such as Music Matters, will stay. Two other intellectual panel programmes, Free Thinking and The Verb, have already made the move from Radio 3 to Radio 4.

However, what this means for radio drama at the BBC could be another thing:

Where does this leave the legacy of audio drama at the BBC? Stripped of the security of the 90-minute format, for sure. The BBC is eager to reassure us that audio drama continues on Radio 4: as yet, however, it offers only drama slots of 45 and (sometimes) 60 minutes.
Over at The Stage, the critic David Benedict recently bemoaned such lengths as unfit for drama. “Forty-five minutes of drama is a horribly unsatisfying length,” he writes, “like a book too long to be a short story, but not long enough to be a novel.”

Unfortunately that piece quoted there is behind a paywall that even 12ft.io couldn’t pull down, so I don’t know what else brother Benedict says in it, but… what a stupid thing to say. There’s this little thing in prose literature that’s too long to be considered a short story but not long enough to be considered a novel, and it’s called the novella. It’s a bit nebulous to properly define in terms of word count and all that, but it’s an acknowledged form that encompasses quite a few generally highly regarded classics. I don’t see any reason why drama can’t encompass shorter forms too, despite Benedict’s preferences… I wonder what he thinks of Beckett’s later works, for example. Wonder, too, how many playwrights have struggled with the 90-minute format over the decades and had to avoid writing either too little or too much…

Sett(l)ing Sun

No  love for the royal family, even lapsed royalty, but I’m pleased to see Harry beating the Scum at last because fuck them even more:

The Duke of Sussex has settled his high court legal action at the eleventh hour against the publisher of the Sun, News Group Newspapers (NGN).
NGN offered “a full and unequivocal apology” to Prince Harry “for the phone hacking, surveillance and misuse of private information by journalists and private investigators instructed by them” at the News of the World.
It will also pay “substantial damages” as the two sides settled their legal claim, Harry’s barrister, David Sherborne, has told the high court.
On Wednesday morning, Sherborne said: “I am pleased to announce to the court that the parties have reached an agreement. As a result of the parties reaching an agreement I would ask formally that the trial is vacated.”

Slightly puzzled by this line in the apology, though:

It is also acknowledged, without any admission of illegality, that NGN’s response to the 2006 arrests and subsequent actions were regrettable.

I presume the arrests in question were those of Clive Goodman, the Scum’s royal editor, and Glen Mulcaire, the PI working with him. Both were arrested in 2006 and jailed the following year, then they both took action against the paper for unfair dismissal, which the paper settled with both. Is that what they’re calling “regrettable” here? And no “admission of illegality” despite having, you know, admitted that a couple of paragraphs earlier? I don’t know. But as long as they’re losing money from whatever they did wrong, I’m fine with it…

Happy 50th, “Double Jay”

It’s 50 years today since the entity now called Triple J began life, and the entity now called Double J has dusted off “the first day of Triple J”, sic, and is replaying it throughout the day… just been rather amused to hear the DJ admit they were having trouble rounding up enough Australian artists for their first day, which I suppose is less of a problem now (and grumbling too about how many months it took some records to appear in Australia after their international release). Kind of impressed they actually recorded the first day and kept it all this time… but listening back to it now it feels very strange (not just because it’s in glorious AM mono). Graham Berry just announced that later in the evening they’d have some live Led Zeppelin and Pink Floyd plus Cheech & Chong and Ravi Shankar. And look at the playlist! Opening with “You Just Like Me Cos I’m Good in Bed” was a fairly controversial act, I know, but… Rolling Stones 2nd? Paul McCartney 3rd? Leo Sayer 4th? Led Zeppelin a couple of tracks later? Beatles, Deep Purple, Bad Company, Elton John, Maria Muldaur, Van Morrison, Rod Stewart, CSN, Santana, “La Grange” by ZZ Top, “Radar Love” by Golden Earring, Steely Dan, JOHN FUCKING DENVER, “You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet” by BTO, “China Grove” by the Doobie Brothers, Tim Buckley… Portsmouth Sinfonia is probably the most radical choice so far, that Cheech & Chong “Mr Dope America” skit wouldn’t have passed on commercial radio… But really, how much of this would you think of as “youth radio” or “alternative” now?

And yet I suppose it must have been in 1975, which I daresay shows how much has changed over 50 years… I mean, those four specific songs just embody more of the Triple M classic rock ethos than they do anything, but I don’t suppose they felt that way at the time (not least because Triple M didn’t actually exist yet, but you know what I mean). And a few years later 2JJ would give Cold Chisel’s “Khe Sanh” a boost when other stations wouldn’t touch it. Now it seems like a veritable Triple M anthem. Have things just changed so much that it’s now almost inconceivable (for me anyway) that this was, you know, alternative then? The kids must’ve been different in 1975 and so must the music, and when I listen to this sort of thing now I’m doing so with years of knowledge of the music that came after it… Radio Birdman hadn’t yet started the Oxford Funhouse scene. A little bit over two years later we got the first Saints album. Must’ve been unimaginable on January 19th 1975. I don’t know, I don’t really have any coherent thoughts about this (you may have noticed). It’s just been intriguing to realise just how must of a foreign country the past can be.

Of course, the day is darkened a little by the passing of Arnold Frolows a few days ago…

In the mid-1970s, Frolows was delivering flowers around Sydney when the opportunity to interview for a role at the ABC’s brand-new youth radio station came up.
Marius Webb and Ron Moss had been tasked with building the station and they hired Frolows before its launch after a tip from Webb’s then secretary.
“Arnold joined Double J before it went to air, indeed, he was one of the first of its very first employees,” long-term colleague Stuart Matchett said at Frolows’s retirement party in 2014.
“He acquired much of the vinyl that made up the original music library. He programmed the music for many of the shows on Double J.” […]
Frolows began at the ABC in November 1974 as a research assistant in the Contemporary Radio Unit, before becoming a presenter and producer on the new 2JJ from July 1975.
His initial stint at the ABC was short, as he decamped overseas in 1977 where he took up other music-industry roles.
By 1981, Frolows was back in Australia and back on the station now known as triple j. He worked as a presenter and producer on various programs, including the Sunday night program, Ambience, which became a cult hit as it introduced audiences to downbeat, often hypnotic music rarely heard on other stations.
His role as music director became official in 1993, but this didn’t stop him from being on the tools. He served as the producer for Helen Razer and Mikey Robins’ triple j breakfast program in the 1990s and would appear on triple j programs presenting new music through the early 2000s. […]
Frolows left triple j in May of 2003. Before his departure, he’d been subject to a raft of commentary regarding his suitability for the role given his age. But he left the role of his own choosing, and never believed his age precluded him performing his job effectively.

I’d quit listening to the Js myself before that, and even more years have passed to the point where “youth radio” is comfortably ensconced in its middle age, but to give Arnold credit, his tenure as music director was better than Kingsmill’s seems to have been (at least if the annual Hottest 100 results are indicative). RIP to him. I bet a bunch of that music I was listening to while writing this came from him, too.

Good night Clive

Clive Robertson has left the studio.

From his Talking Heads interview from a long time ago:

PETER THOMPSON: What are you interested in? Did you say want to say something through all of this?
CLIVE ROBERTSON: Um, I’d have to say the order of things especially at Channel 9, the order of news items. And if I said, “Look, this is really important”, I’d look at the camera and say, “This is a really important story” and set it up, and if it was an important story, then the audience think, “Oh this guy’s a good filter.” If you said, “Look, this is a silly item, I don’t know why we’re running it” and you run it and it is a silly item, you’ve got them. And it’s not a con. What that program did is different from most news programs is gave things what they really were worth.
PETER THOMPSON: But you were also by playing this role, undercutting the artifice what it is a lot of television.
CLIVE ROBERTSON: Oh, yeah, and did that go down well with the journalists? Have a guess Peter. “He’s ruling our station” and all that rubbish. I mean, we get a new item in at, say, 10.30 at night and I’d say, “By the way, you’ll see this at 6 o’clock tomorrow night” and they’ll say it’s the latest, “you know better”. “You can’t say things like that.” Well, you know, come on, so journalists are a bit thick as you know, Peter, you’ve worked with a few, they really are thick. I mean, they really should be sterilised.

I used to watch Clive back in the 80s when he was on commercial TV, because I was a slightly strange child drawn to programs that I wasn’t really old enough for. He may have been something of an influence on me. This is awfully sad.

Young berks

It’s been a long time since I regularly watched TYT, which I was a lot more into back in the days of Mushroom Cock’s first go round, and I always thought they were basically good but inclined to shrillness. That was what put me off them rather than bad hot takes or anything like that. But the hot takes do seem to have been getting worse in the last few years, especially from Ana Kasparian who’s been on the same “leaving the left” trip she used to blast Dave Rubin for… and now it looks like brother Cenk is following a similar more TERFy course himself. Oof. Joe, my housemate, is particularly furious cos he was actually a paying member of their network for a while, so he feels quite betrayed, moreso than me cos he invested in them. I don’t blame him. Cenk fucking embarrassed himself on that appearance on his nephew’s channel, which is excerpted at some length in this video; Joe is especially incensed at him for accusing Sam Seder of being a grifter, and I’m sure that Sam’s not rigorously perfect but goddamn, “grifter” is the last word I’d use of him… but it is a word I think we’ll see aimed at TYT more often after this. I expect John Iadarola will quit TYT after this bullshit to focus on his own thing and I don’t think he’ll be the last one…

Satire is… alive and well?

The Onion wins Alex Jones’ Infowars in bankruptcy auction

No, REALLY.

I’ll admit, I didn’t think 2024 could offer anything that might offset the prospective horror of Mushroom Cock 2.0, but the fucking ONION buying Infowars has certainly gone some way towards doing just that. And the NBC article linked above refers you to a video by little Alex wherein he himself mentions the Onion buying it, so it’s not just an Onion story however much it feels like. I didn’t know how much I wanted/needed this to happen until it did, and right now I am the happiest I’ve been in quite some time.