She Killed in Ecstasy (1971)

From one German film to a… very different one. The Century of Cinema project was probably doomed to feature some unabashed trash, let’s face it, and frankly unabashed trash doesn’t come much more unabashed than Jess Franco. I actually had it in mind to rewatch Vampyros Lesbos for it, but then I thought, why not go instead with one of his that I haven’t seen? Why not cross something else off my absurdly large to-watch list, especially something I’ve had waiting for so long that I bought it on DVD rather than blu… Hence, therefore, tonight’s second film, which seems to be generally considered one of Tio Jess’ better films and I’d probably agree with that myself. Plotwise, we’re dealing with a fairly simple revenge plot: doctor who’s been doing some unorthodox experiments is struck off the medical register and kills himself as a consequence; his grieving and evidently no longer 100% sane widow goes on a quest to kill the four doctors responsible for striking him down. Nothing too complicated in the plot department, but I don’t suppose anyone comes to Franco for the plot (they also don’t come for a serious discussion about the ethics of Johnson’s research and if the board wasn’t actually right to reject him, which is good cos the film never offers anything of the sort). In this case, they’re coming for the unfortunate and tragic Soledad Miranda:

Ms. “Korda” is nothing if not a singular presence throughout the film, in her various states of dress and undress; I recall saying once on my old blog that I have trouble judging the quality of acting performances when they’re not done in English—I don’t know if that’s her voice on the soundtrack or not, cos I don’t know how well or if she spoke German—but in this case I think I can actually make an exception. This was really good. And face it, no one comes to a Jess Franco film for good acting either, but for once you get it here. I really should’ve watched this a lot sooner than I did. Going to invest in a blu upgrade, at any rate.

The Hound of the Baskervilles (1929)

Apart from the Wallace & Gromit film, I think this is my favourite first-time watch in the Century of Cinema project so far. This was one of the last big European silent film productions, and like an awful lot of silent cinema it then proceeded to vanish for decades, with a print only turning up as recently as 2008. The blu-ray also includes its even longer-lost 1914 predecessor, which the booklet essay (handily reproduced here) compares to a Louis Feuillade serial rather than Doyle; both were the work of Richard Oswald, who wrote the 1914 and directed this one. I gather the 1929 version is more faithful to the book—for one thing Watson is actually in it, which he apparently isn’t in the earlier film—though it clearly retains some Feuillade-ish elements in its latter stages. Still, if not exactly pure Doyle, it’s a terrific watch, and I’ll illustrate with a few shots:

There’s some really tremendous atmospherics throughout the film, and the camerawork is remarkably mobile even for a 1920s German film, so you get a great sense of the size of the Baskerville Hall interior among other things. It’s a compact story, unfortunately rendered a bit more compact by the loss of much of reels two and three from the only known print; some of this (plus bits of reel 5) has been filled in by footage from the 9.5mm copy that Pathe produced for home viewing (apparently, though the film never got an American release, it did good enough business in Europe to merit a “home video” release, but the rest had to be filled in with stills and title cards explaining the missing scenes (Watson arriving at Baskerville Hall, establishing the Barrymores and Stapletons). But it’s not really distracting, and the rest of the film is great. I think we can fairly describe this as a major rediscovery, and its reputation will hopefully grow.

Torso (1973)

Well, that was pleasant viewing. Sergio Martino is considered one of the major giallo directors, despite only really making five of them and those all within the first three or so years of his directorial career, and despite also not really being considered an auteur like Dario Argento (at least according to Kat Ellinger on the blu-ray commentary). He made other films after this that don’t seem to be considered “proper” gialli as such, so this was his last “real” one, and what an… unclean film it is. Plotwise, we’re in the rather delightful-looking (if dangerously paved) town of Perugia, where a female student has been found strangled, with the murder weapon soon being revealed as a distinctive black and red scarf. When another student is killed, a group of female students heads out of town to a villa owned by one of the girls’ uncles, but that’s not going to be far enough away… Torso is regarded in some quarters as a proto-slasher, which I can kind of see, and Ellinger characterises it a few times as “cynical”, which, yeah. There’s something vaguely dirty about it, as I said, something kind of leering about it when it comes to the more sexual stuff (including an interesting bit of interracial lesbian business), particularly the kind of revolting villagers in the town around the villa. It’s well enough made, particularly in the last third or so, and the score is really good, but it’s also deeply unpleasant in a way that I haven’t often felt when watching gialli in the past… interestingly, Ellinger says Martino was fairly uncomfortable with sex in his films, so I’m not sure what to make of that after seeing this. I’m not sure what I make of the ultimate reveal of the killer, who turns out to be pretty much the only male character that the film doesn’t try to make you think could be the one; I suppose I see a certain logic to it but I’m not sure how well it actually works. So that’s Torso, perfectly well made but also pretty hard to like as such.

Bill gets the bus

Well HERE’s something remarkable, on multiple levels, William Hartnell on record in 1931 (hence why I’m filing it under music even though there is none, cos “film & TV” feels wrong)… a “one-act thriller” first broadcast on the BBC in 1927, then re-recorded four years later. I never knew until literally just a few minutes ago that this was even a thing; I knew he was in films from the early ’30s on, but I’ve never seen any reference to this until now. So that’s remarkable enough, and probably so is the fact that it survives, but, well, so is the fact that it was even made in the first place. Cos… why was it made? Was there a market for this sort of record? Cos I can’t imagine there being much of one somehow, and yet it was clearly a commercial recording, not just something pulled from the BBC archive or some such. I wonder who was buying this sort of thing.

As for the author, well, “Martin Hussingtree” actually turns out to be a place rather than a person… but the person using the name turns out to have been interesting, assuming there wasn’t another “Martin Hussingtree” out there. He appears to have been Oliver Baldwin, son of British PM Stanley Baldwin, and one of his other literary works was a book called Konyetz, which is described thus:

Konyetz is a dystopian science fiction novel written by UK politician and author Oliver Ridsdale Baldwin, who used the pseudonym Martin Hussingtree. Baldwin, the son of British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin, adopted his pseudonym from a small village in Worcestershire near the Baldwin family ironworks factory in Wilden. The novel was published in 1924 and reflects Baldwin’s profound experiences during World War One, which transformed him into an avowed socialist.
The title, Konyetz, is Russian for “end” or “termination.” The novel depicts a series of social upheavals leading to the invasion of Britain by a Jewish-Bolshevik conspiracy. This invasion triggers a worldwide future war that culminates in the apocalypse and the end of civilization. The story combines elements of apocalypse, plague, and political turmoil, capturing Baldwin’s disillusionment with contemporary English politics and the global situation.
Baldwin’s novel is summarized by some as a strange yet striking forecast of the end of Western civilization, where a Labour-governed Britain faces bombing and gassing by the invading forces. The novel’s grim depiction of societal collapse and global conflict was undoubtedly influenced by Baldwin’s wartime experiences and his political views, which led him to become a Labour Member of Parliament in 1929.

I don’t know about you, but a dystopian novel about a “Jewish-Bolshevik conspiracy” destroying civilisation doesn’t suggest to me at least that the author of said book might be an “avowed socialist”… and yet Baldwin Jr was, very much, an avowed socialist. Mind you, per his Wiki entry, he also had an unfortunate run-in with Bolsheviks in Armenia during his post WW1, pre-parliamentary career (after which he was jailed in Turkey for spying for the Bolsheviks), so perhaps he was fine with socialism, just not a fan of the Soviets (and/or Jews)? I don’t know.

One of these days…

Weren’t we supposed to have already put astronauts on Mars by this year?

Oh yeah.

Elon Musk’s dream of sending humans to Mars could come true in the next decade.
Speaking at Vox Media’s Code Conference, the SpaceX CEO said he believes it’s possible to send the first humans to the Red Planet by 2025.
“If things go according to plan, we should be able to launch people probably in 2024 with arrival in 2025,” Musk said. His timeline puts the privately held SpaceX ahead of NASA’s goal of sending the first astronauts to Mars sometime in the 2030s.

Also, note that Edolf just says it’ll “launch” next year, maybe. No guarantee that it’ll even make it out of the atmosphere, of course, never mind making it as far as our red neighbour, given some of SpaceX’s recent misadventures…

The 7th Voyage of Sinbad (1958)

Ah, classic Hollywood orientalism. Let’s get that out of the way first, the film is full of obviously white people in varying degrees of makeup playing characters that are clearly meant to be Middle Eastern, but it’s not like any of these characters are actual people as such, so I suppose if we can cope with the other legendary monsters the film features, we can cope with these equally mythical Anglo-looking Arabs? Too bad if we can’t, cos I have a few more films in this vein waiting to be watched and reviewed, and in this case at least you’d be missing quite a lot of fun. As Wiki notes, the film’s not really based on the actual “7th voyage” story, but more on other adventures of Sinbad with a bit of the Odyssey thrown in (though those elements seem to be in one of the Sinbad stories too)… Sinbad and his crew land on the isle of Colossa and fall in with a magician called Sokurah when the latter loses a magic lamp to a cyclops; Sinbad is disinclined to go back there despite Sokurah’s begging, so the latter contrives an interesting reason to make him change his mind. Director Nathan Juran was building a certain reputation as a director of this sort of thing, and we’ll see more of him as I go through the collection cos I’ve accrued quite a few of his titles; here he teamed up again with Ray Harryhausen, whose first colour production this was, and let’s face it, Harryhausen’s work is what you come to a film like this rather than the thespian display… no doubt star Kerwin Matthews was a lovely person, but possibly not the most magnetic screen presence. But you’re not here for him, you’re here for the cyclopes, and the snake woman, and the rocs, and the dragon, and the fighting skeleton (which he’d expand upon a few years later in Jason and the Argonauts), and though HD video possibly enhances just how old these effects look all these decades later, I’d still take them over their probable modern CGI equivalents. This must’ve been an absolute blast in 1958, especially if you were a kid.

Sure, why not

I barely know what’s real online any more, so I don’t know if this is an actual post by Edolf and, if so, if he’s actually planning to do this. But… it’s something he would do, wouldn’t he. I mean, the secretary for defence is best known as a Fox News commentator and the head of the CIA is best known as a podcaster, so why not Steven Seagal as the head of the Secret Service. Why the FUCK not.