I’ve always been fascinated by the idea that certain films, especially of a horrific nature, should be banned because they might inspire people to, you know, imitate the terrible things shown therein, but somehow the censors who decide on banning or cutting these films never suffer any such ill effects from them. That was partly what drew me to Censor, which is about a young woman working for the BBFC in the mid-eighties in the midst of video nasty hysteria, who proves to be… not entirely cut out for the job, shall we say; Enid has a reputation for being one of the hardest scissor-wielders, but she starts facing harrassment when a film she did pass inspires a hideous copycat crime… and the personal baggage she carries, in the form of a sister who disappeared when the two girls were young, gradually becomes heavier and heavier.
So I liked the idea of this a lot, but not so much the execution, unfortunately… director Prano Bailey-Bond opts for the non-exploitative approach this could’ve taken; this still allows for one rather amazing jump-scare and a number of kills as Enid’s sanity starts to evaporate, one of which is kind of hilarious, but on the whole it’s possibly played with a bit too much restraint, and the film is left with an overall rather dry and slightly ponderous flavour. Plus it never makes much of its particular period setting and does require a certain amount of prior knowledge. Mind you, it pulls off its climax fairly well; the lighting of the night-time filming sequence (and the variable film frame size in this scene) makes the whole thing look so good that I can almost ignore the question of why the filmmaker had a real axe on set that could actually kill someone (and does) rather than just a prop one. It’s OK. I’d still be interested in seeing what Bailey-Bond does next.
So I watched a George Romero film the other night, but did I just watch another one? Cos apparently a rumour persists that Maximum Overdrive is at least partly his work, given the substance abuse its nominal maker, one Stephen King, was apparently engaging/rampaging in while making it*… and King has apparently never confirmed or denied beyond saying Romero was always on set to offer him directorial advice on his first (and still only) feature film. Whatever. It’s odd, I admit, that I consider myself at least a bit of a horror fan, but despite that I have so little acquaintance with Mr King and his oeuvre… only ever read a handful of his books and seen a handful of the films made therefrom. I have at least partly rectified that tonight, I suppose…
Well, that was something, albeit I’m not 100% sure what. I’m trying to use this month of horror viewing to catch up on some of the bigger and older hits of the genre that I’ve hitherto never seen rather than rewatches, hence tonight’s screening… Phantasm has a certain reputation for not making a lot of sense, and I can’t say it doesn’t live up to that; I’d have struggled with it had I not read the Wikipedia summary of it. I think I liked it but I am genuinely unsure. I suppose you can view it as an interesting example of low-budget independent filmmaking somewhat like Halloween, the sort of things you can do with minimal resources and a particular vision… and I will say director Don Coscarelli certainly had one of those; I just don’t know how well he explained it. I knew Phantasm had originally been nearly twice as long as the end result, supposedly mostly character development stuff that Coscarelli decided was ultimately redundant, but I feel like there was a certain amount of expository stuff that got chucked out too. Alas that, apart from the minimal sense-making, Phantasm‘s other chief weakness is Bill Thornbury in one of the main roles; there is an unfortunately good reason why his acting career has been so limited, namely that so is his acting ability… I must give it points for the things it does well, of course, especially the mood it conjures (great night-time filming too), and of course Angus Scrimm as the Tall Man. He doesn’t really do an awful lot but he also doesn’t really need to; he just needs to kind of stand there and be tall. Which, measuring at 6’4″ as he apparently did, he was very good at, and the climactic chase scene where he’s pursuing the teenage lead is particularly effective because of the size difference between them. On the whole, possibly interesting more than actually successful, but I’ll take that over dull…
Or, what happens when the Lutheran Church hires horror director George Romero to make a film in which the horror is… old age. The Lutherans basically asked him to make a sort of educational film or PSA about the way in which we don’t look after our elderly as well as we should, giving him a bunch of volunteer performers and a freely donated location. What Romero gave them in return was, probably, regrets, and I’ll bet they REALLY appreciated the scene in which our sorely beset protagonist finds “sanctuary” at a church bandstand, only for it to close for the day before he can get to it… apparently they actually did make some use of it, but after a film festival screening in 1975 that seemed to be the end of it until it was rescued from oblivion just before George’s death. He seems to have viewed it himself as being as ephemeral as the industrial films and commercials he was making in the 60s… but if he did, he was nonetheless clearly determined to make something more of this production than a “normal” commissioned work. The amusement park gave him room to hammer home the thesis of “old people are treated like shit” (the film has no real subtlety on that point), which he does in a manner that becomes borderline surrealist, and generates a real sense of deep unease, particularly with the use of sound. I found it interesting that, for all the thematics about old age being awful, the other elderly folks surrounding the old man in the thick of things are about as unhelpful to him as the younger people surrounding them all. And yet 54 minutes of it, short as that is, felt like a bit much; Romero could probably have brought this in more tightly and effectively in about 30 minutes. So I can’t call it a full success, and yet there’s something about the strangeness of the whole thing that’s fascinating. I think further viewings will benefit it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.