
Puns really are the shittiest form of humour…

Puns really are the shittiest form of humour…
Yes, we’re all sick of the coronation but the oddest story to come from it has just started spreading: it seems that composer Karl Jenkins (one of whose works was to be played at the big show) caused a bizarre amount of confusion on social media among people who, frankly, couldn’t believe he looked like he does, e.g.:

The Classic FM article helpfully also includes this photo of him in his days in Soft Machine:

That’s him at left in the back, demonstrating that he has indeed kind of always looked like that. I find this whole thing very strange but also rather delightful, and fortunately it appears that so does Sir Karl… best publicity he’s probably had in years if nothing else.
Continuing “Horror May-hem” with book #4 for the year, Algernon Blackwood’s 1908 collection of stories about the titular “occult detective”, not the first of his kind (Le Fanu and Machen had beaten him to it in the 1800s) but more influential on later ones than his predecessors were. A curious set of five stories (plus one more Blackwood wrote for a later collection), in that Silence’s part in them is highly variable… the actual “I” narrating the stories is actually his assistant Hubbard, whose own part in the stories is similarly up and down. As for Silence, he’s only really a leading actor in two and a half of the stories, he’s essentially a deus ex machina in the fourth, and does practically nothing in the remaining one; he’s the link that connects all these stories but he’s only really partly the star of his own book. I wonder if that’s because there’s only so much you could probably do with the character, who is the sort of all-knowing unfailingly good guy who’s hard to make terribly interesting (even Sherlock Holmes made mistakes).
But, all that considered, I still enjoyed this a lot (though the idea in the last story that the young Canadian man becomes a werewolf partly because of his Native ancestry is a bit… ergh). Lovecraft hails him as the master of atmosphere in Supernatural Horror in Literature, and I think atmosphere is what the book does best; you get a really solid sense of place (and you do get a good variety of settings across these tales) and overall enigmatic vibe of things in each story. This also at least begins to plug a major gap in my knowledge of the supernatural classics; of Lovecraft’s “big four” (Blackwood, Dunsany, James and Machen, with Hodgson kind of bringing up the rear as a later discovery), Blackwood was until now the only one I hadn’t at least one full book by (I’d only read one story, that being “The Wendigo”; no, I haven’t even read the celebrated “Willows” before). I have now done that and intend to continue doing so.
Parenthetically: though I used that Dover cover art I actually read John Silence in one of those giant Delphi “complete works” collections. The latter actually includes a picture of the first edition, but I chose against using that cos, frankly, there’s a swastika on the cover. I mean, it’s a 1908 book, it’s a pre-Hitler swastika, so it’s not a bad one. But even so… I’ve actually seen with my own eyes in an antiquarian bookshop books from a hundred years earlier with swastikas in the cover design, and though I knew they weren’t bad ones (I think the books were from 1912 or something) it was still immensely jarring at first. So I decided to go with the more recent cover art. Fucking Nazis.

Via Pulp Librarian, this… slightly worrying-looking poster advertising travel in Norway. It’s from 1905, so about 80-something years too early for the goth demographic it appears to be aimed at…

The concept that “peaceful freedom” might be actually be an achievable thing seems to elude thse cunts all the time. Or maybe it doesn’t elude them so much as it threatens them. Threatens their image of themselves as BIG TOUGH GUYS who would OBVIOUSLY have taken that Texas shooter DOWN WITH THEIR BARE HANDS cos they’re so TOUGH and HEROIC they wouldn’t even need a gun, but they’d have one to hand anyway just in case their penis went soft in all the excitement… Honestly, America’s a fucking death cult and it’ll never be anything else as l0ng as the NRA is allowed to exist and the cult of the 2nd amendment keeps worshipping that idol…
Gutterblood with Bonnie Prince Bob, “Gardyloo”, which is a delightful term from Edinburgh via the French language. What relevance the word (which kind of translates to “watch yersels doon in the street, we’re putt’n’ oot the shite”) has to the British monarchy is something I have absolutely no idea about. Not the slightest clue. Also, “Hanoverian” and “Luciferian” is one of the best rhymes I’ve ever heard.

I know he says something about bringing not peace but a sword in the book, but this is taking that a bit too far and over-literally…

“…And then into the mercy seat he climbs?”
“Onto the throne, Nick. Throne. It’s not an electric chair.”
“…So the crown doesn’t electrocute him?”
“Afraid not.”
“But… Rowan, why did Albo invite me to this thing if there’s no violent death involved?”
“Buggered if I know, Nick. I’m as confused by your presence here as your fans are.”
And I’m not 100% sure what I think of those thoughts…
And so the question today for Australia is not to do with his coronation but with ourselves, that we should in the end and at last decide on the republic and not talk ourselves out of voting yes for it. So that’s the question still. Not the coronation today and the mystique of monarchy. Our own intent is the point. Australian republicans can say God save the king! Because Charles is not the problem, and in any case is still our constitutional head of state until we do something about that. The lies of politicians who pretend that Mandarin will become Australia’s chief language, that there will be tanks in the street, that the milk will turn to blood if we give up elitist monarchy for fraternal republic – they are the problem with this process. They are rustling up equivalent misrepresentations to hinder the voice vote.
I mean, on one hand, yeah? I do think Australia will go republic at some point that I may even live to see; it might even be sooner rather than later (assuming Albo gets re-elected and sticks to his promise about a referendum in his second term, so we may get it as early as 2025). But I don’t know that it’s the monarchists who are the problem; rather, it’s the republicans… or at any rate, it’s the Australian Republican Movement‘s insistence upon the “Australian Choice Model”…
Continue reading “Thomas Keneally has thoughts on the republic”


You must be logged in to post a comment.