In the rich man’s world

‘Obscene’: Anger after cost of King Charles’s coronation revealed

The coronation of King Charles in May 2023 cost taxpayers at least £72m, official figures have revealed.
The cost of policing the ceremony was £21.7m, with a further £50.3m in costs racked up by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
About 20 million people in Britain watched Charles crowned at Westminster Abbey on TV, substantially fewer than the 29 million Britons who had watched the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II in 2022. […]
Republic, which campaigns to replace the monarchy with an elected head of state and more democratic political system, described the coronation as an “obscene” waste of taxpayers’ money.
“I would be very surprised if £72m was the whole cost,” the Republic CEO, Graham Smith, told the Guardian.
As well as the Home Office policing and DCMS costs included in the figures, he said the Ministry of Defence, Transport for London, fire brigades and local councils also incurred costs related to the coronation, with other estimates putting the total spend at between £100m and £250m.

Yeah. I have no idea what the actual amount would be, but if they’re admitting to 72 million quid (about $140m Australian at the current rate on Oanda) then I wouldn’t be surprised to find it was a lot more. Hope taxpayers feel they got their money’s worth, given that more of them were interested in Chuckles’ mum’s funeral than his crowning…

Worth a thousand words?

Gina Rinehart demands National Gallery of Australia remove her portrait

The mining billionaire Gina Rinehart has demanded the National Gallery of Australia remove her portrait from an exhibition by the award-winning artist Vincent Namatjira.
The image, arguably an unflattering picture of Australia’s richest woman, is one of many portraits unveiled at the Canberra gallery as part of the Archibald prize-winning artist’s first major survey exhibition.
The National Gallery has rebuffed efforts to have the picture taken down and said in a statement that it welcomed public dialogue on its collection and displays.

I can’t say that I don’t entirely see Gina’s point, cos it’s really not flattering to her… but by the same token she’s also one of the worst people in Australia, so we may ask if she deserved a flattering portrait in the first place.

Talking of portraits…

…Chuckles has unveiled his, and… it’s… red?

Jonathon Yeo was chosen to do the portrait – he’s done paintings of lots of other famous figures, including Sir David Attenborough and Malala Yousafzai.
The artist said he wanted to make a break with the past. This means he wanted to paint something slightly different to other, more traditional paintings of monarchs.
This is why he used a bright red colour throughout the painting.

The portrait seems to have drawn mixed reviews (though his kingship seems satisfied with it). I… kind of like it? I suspect my mum would’ve hated it, but I do think it’s interesting at least. However, Nigel Farage says he likes it too, so I don’t know how to feel about that…

Kancer for the King!

So Charlie Windsor has cancer of some sort.

King Charles has been diagnosed with cancer and is already receiving treatment that will prevent him from undertaking public duties for the immediate future, Buckingham Palace has announced.
Although no further details about what type of cancer he has are being released at this stage, Buckingham Palace said it was not prostate cancer. It was discovered when the 75-year-old monarch recently underwent treatment at the London Clinic for a benign enlarged prostate.
Buckingham Palace said the king “remains wholly positive about his treatment”.
He began regular outpatient treatments on Monday, and although he has been forced to postpone public-facing engagements, he will continue with his constitutional role as head of state, including paperwork, his red boxes and private meetings.

Cue a lot of agonising over what this means for the monarchy if the king can’t actually function, who’s going to do whatever it is the royals actually do… are some of the younger ones going to have to pull their weight and actually work for once? The least helpful comment so far has surely been one I’ve seen reported as coming from Chuck’s* former press secretary, according to whom the fact that the king has cancer shows that obviously anyone can get it. WHO WOULD HAVE GUESSED? No wonder you’re his former press secretary if that’s the best you can come up with in this situation…

Anyway, I have no particular feelings on the matter other than as a somewhat remote spectacle. Whatever else happens, Charles will have the best specialists in the world and the best care that money can buy, and he will be supremely looked after. And while this whole business may well show that, hey, the obscenely rich can get cancer just as easily as you Poor People, this is also what separates him from those Poor People. He can afford to get cancer in a way lots of people can’t, cos maybe they don’t have insurance, they can’t afford not to work, they’ve got to worry about where this’ll leave the rest of the family financially, etc. To use my own mum as an example: when her cancer came back in 2012, the treatment she got involved this anti-nausea pill that, for reasons I forget now (possibly her being a pensioner), only cost here five dollars per round of three pills, but normally cost ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY DOLLARS for the same three pills for everyone else. So I obviously don’t celebrate Charles getting cancer, but it’s probably not going to be the disaster for him that it could be for others.

* At this point I initially mistyped “Chuck” as “Cuck”, for what it may be worth. I briefly debated with myself whether or not to correct it.

Song of the day

Gutterblood with Bonnie Prince Bob, “Gardyloo”, which is a delightful term from Edinburgh via the French language. What relevance the word (which kind of translates to “watch yersels doon in the street, we’re putt’n’ oot the shite”) has to the British monarchy is something I have absolutely no idea about. Not the slightest clue. Also, “Hanoverian” and “Luciferian” is one of the best rhymes I’ve ever heard.

Long live Mrs Ethel Shroake

The more I read about the upcoming coronation, the more I’m reminded of this old Nemesis the Warlock image:

After his disappearance and presumed death, the spirit of Torquemada reappears in Termight where “there was much rejoicing”, and at bottom left we see some of Torquemada’s Terminators making sure there’s rejoicing. It feels from this admitted distance that this is what Saturday’s festivities are going to be like, especially with this news from the Home Office:

Continue reading “Long live Mrs Ethel Shroake”

God fuck the King

Public invited to swear their allegiance as king is crowned

British subjects asked to form a ‘chorus of a million voices’ and make oath of loyalty while watching service
Members of the public watching the coronation on television, online and in parks and pubs will be invited to swear aloud their allegiance to the monarch in a “chorus of millions of voices” to be known as the Homage of the People.
People around the UK and abroad will be invited to say the words “I swear that I will pay true allegiance to your majesty, and to your heirs and successors according to law. So help me God”, in a declaration that replaces the traditional homage of peers.

GET

ENTIRELY

ONE HUNDRED PERCENT

FUCKED

Good fucking grief. And if you do go to a public place to watch the ceremony, you’d be scared not to take part in this nonsense in case the people you’re watching it with turned on you for not doing so, cos they would. Then again, I suppose if you were going to watch it somewhere public you’re probably already the person who would take part in this homage bullshit anyway… Obviously we colonials are welcome to take part too, but I can’t see that ending well…