A theological point I’d never considered

Holy Righteous Penis (Batman). This makes me wonder various things including 1) where do women’s vaginas come from in that case and 2) …what else do you use your penis for? I know Puppetry of the Penis is a thing, and so is Lifto from the Jim Rose Circus, but… are there other things? Can you tape a paintbrush on it and do art with it? Learn to shoot lasers from it? I ask this as an avowed penis-haver, though mine is frankly pretty humdrum so maybe that’s why I can’t imagine doing things other than sex and peeing with it (and let’s face it, it only does the latter of those things as it is)…

How should I swear, then?

Daniel Lord was an American Jesuit whose lasting legacy was probably (at least jointly) the Production Code aka the Hays Code which (arguably) hobbled the American film industry for decades; swearing was just one of the things it prohibited (indeed, it was the very first thing outlawed in Will Hays’ original 1927 list of “Don’ts”), and evidently it vexed Lord enough that in 1943 he wrote a whole pamphlet about it. Notice that this is clearly a British edition of it, so I wonder if he had to adapt it to local tastes in profanity…

Anyway, I’m kind of amused to have found this after also recently discovering this delightful document on a related note from 1898; for all that people complain about sledging in cricket in modern times, particularly by Australian cricketers, clearly American baseball players were way ahead of them, to the point where one of the sport’s top executives wrote this letter with examples of the bad words currently in use… but what makes it hilarious is the “UNMAILABLE” notice at the end, because the thing contained enough profanity that if they’d mailed it and it had been intercepted for some reason they could’ve been up on an obscenity charge…

Lost profits?

This is the splash image on the website for an Australian Christian clothing brand…

…called Lost Prophets…

…and that’s their rationale for the name. Which is fine in and of itself, but I can’t believe no one at the company did even a quick Google check to see if the name was already taken or not. And it was. By these guys. A Welsh rock band whose frontman turned out to be one of the worst pedophiles in Britain, who was sentenced to nearly 30 years for his activities and has since had nearly another year added onto that for trying to continue his bullshit while behind bars. You would think someone at the clothing company would have discovered this and they would’ve reconsidered using the name, but I can only assume the conversation in the office went something like this:

“Hey, I just did a Google search and it turns out that the name we were going to use already got taken.”
“Oh?”
“Yeah, there was this Welsh rock band whose singer was a pedo.”
“OH. Um… how did they spell the name?”
“One word.”
“Fine, we’ll just spell it as two words and no one will ever make the connection. Anyway, we’re a religious organisation, no one ever associates them with kiddy fiddlers anyway.”
“…What?”
“What?”

Babylon Bullshit

So the Babylon Bee is a right-wing religious political humour site, of which this is an example:

Oh what a comedy classic. John Fetterman is a Democrat senator and, as of last year, a stroke survivor. Whether or not he should be in politics in his not exactly optimal state of health is a question for which I don’t there’s an easy answer, except to note that an appearance he made where he greeted the audience by saying “good night” (I presume that’s at least in part what inspired this “joke”) did him few favours…

Anyway, he’s in politics with a disability (he apparently has no cognitive damage but does have auditory processing disorder; I’m not sure how that doesn’t constitute a cognitive issue) and he’s a liberal politician at that, so obviously that makes him a fair target because disability is FUNNY AS FUCK, isn’t it, when you don’t have one. And, well, I responded to the Babylon Bee by hoping that they did.

And then a moment later this happened:

…OK, then. I fired back a response asking them to explain why my tweet was apparently so much more abusive than the BB’s original post mocking a man’s health issues, and they basically told me to go fuck myself (not in those words as such, but you know what I mean). Anyway, I didn’t feel like pulling a Jordan Peterson cos I find Twatter useful enough even now that I don’t want to abandon it entirely (too many people I follow there don’t want to switch to Mastodon), so I deleted the tweet and have to wait until tomorrow to use the account again… but, while conceding I said something pretty harsh, I stand by it nonetheless. Fuck Babylon Bee.

RIP Father Bob

Bob Maguire, professional crusty old bugger and much loved Catholic priest who made the critical error of taking his vocation seriously and caring for people, has left us at the age of 88, and he shouldn’t have done. By several accounts, he was ousted from his own Father Bob Maguire Foundation last week, and was apparently unaware of the fact himself until it was reported on social media. I feel there’s more to the story regarding what’s happened and why it’s happened now, but the foundation appears to have pulled off an absolute cunt act against an old man in declining health during his last days, and indeed probably helped make them his last days.

I think it’s appropriate to let John Safran have the last word, since he helped bring the old boy to the nation’s attention, and he shall miss him more than most of us.

EDIT: Well, actually, let’s give the p.s. to the Foundation themselves, who I’ve now seen issued a statement the other day:

“…The issues at stake were thoroughly canvassed and considered at a recent VCAT Hearing in which Fr Bob participated. The result of that hearing was that Fr Bob’s family were granted Guardianship in relation to where he lives and what care he gets. VCAT does not make such decisions lightly. It relies on a number of medical views of Fr Bob’s physical and mental condition.
Of particular relevance is that the VCAT decision means that Fr Bob is no longer eligible to be a Board member (or Chairman) of the Foundation. This is a legal dictate under the Guardianship and Administration Act 2019.

I don’t know about anyone else, but that reads to me like a tacit admission that, yeah, the Foundation kind of lied a bit in their previous statement about Bob “stepping down”. If this is a VCAT rule (and it may be, I don’t actually know) that he had to step down, why didn’t they say as much earlier? I also thought this was an interesting further remark after denying all the claims being made against them:

Those familiar with Fr Bob’s mental state are not surprised by recent comments attributed to him. Fr Bob has always been someone who ‘comes out swinging’ in any context. However, in recent times his opinions have taken on an eccentric flavour.

And, obviously, I’m not familiar with his mental state, which I’m guessing was indeed less than optimal, but I do smell a hint of well-poisoning here despite that.

Incidentally, it’s nearly 9.30pm as I write these last words and I find it interesting, shall we say, that I’ve seen no word (at least not on the SMH site, The Age, News.com.au or the Guardian) from any representatives of the Catholic church here in Australia, or from their representatives in the Liberal party, or from anyone in the Liberal party in general (all I’ve seen from the latter is a comment from the Victorian opposition leader John Pesutto) so far today. Weird how quick they were to praise that pedophile enabler a couple of months ago but not Bob now, eh. (I’d be a lot more OK with Bob getting a state funeral than I was the other guy, I must say.) Maybe the church’s media team are just trying to find a way of expressing sadness over his passing without admitting what they really thought of him…

Whoops

So some dickhead called Stephen Wolfe said something on Twitter about white evangelicals being the bulwark against “moral insanity” in America, and a company called Canon Press objected to this politely:

That’d be the same Norman Rockwell who underwent an unexpected leftening in the 60s and got hate mail from racists over his painting “The Problem We All Live With”, and who wasn’t a particularly regular churchgoer of any kind, let alone Evangelical

They are, I think, not wrong about this. But this is a little rich coming from Canon Press specifically…

To be clear, THIS is dumber

…given that they’re the right-wing Christian publisher who published Stephen Wolfe’s book The Case for Christian Nationalism. I feel like whoever’s looking after Canon’s social media is going to be reassigned shortly to a position where they can’t publicly call shit on their authors, even if they’re right…