Melania goes down?

Remember that “documentary” about the current Mrs Trump? It is now bidding fair to be one of the worst box office tankers of all time, having cost an obscene $40m (which NO documentary should ever cost; apparently nearly three-quarters of that amount went to its subject) plus an alleged $35m extra for marketing. It looks like it will return almost none of that investment. From the Graun:

UK ticket sales for Melania are so far “soft”, according to Tim Richards, the chief executive of Vue, one of the country’s biggest cinema operators. Just one ticket has been sold for the first 3.10pm screening on Friday at its flagship Islington branch in London, while two have been booked for 6pm.
At the time of publication, all seats remained available for the 28 screenings of Melania at the Blackburn, Castleford and Hamilton branches.
The picture was slightly rosier at the Cineworld in Wandsworth, which had sold four tickets, while five backrow seats were also booked at the Cineworld in Broughton. […]
One industry analyst told the Guardian they suspected the underlying strategy was “four-walling”, meaning distributors pay a set fee to each cinema if they agree to play a certain title.
This would explain why so many exhibitors – which usually adopt a revenue-sharing model with distributors – have agreed to take on a movie with such modest financial prospects at a time when award-nominated films are vying for screen time.
“I’d be amazed if box office gets reported on this title,” added the pundit, who wished to remain anonymous.

I’m sure the box office will be reported… it’s just that the report will be a complete lie. The regime is so full of shit about everything else, it’s not going to be honest about this either… It is being shown in Australia, too, but, per Channel 9, it’s doing about as badly here as in the UK:

At its one screening this Friday at Sydney’s Hoyts Warringah Mall, not a single ticket has been sold. In Cronulla, one person is going.
At three cinemas in Melbourne, nobody has reserved a seat. Two tickets have been sold at a fourth.
Most people don’t buy movie tickets several days ahead of time, so the true reception won’t be known until Friday.
But a lack of pre-sales does indicate a lack of interest.

The other thing the film has lacked, apparently, is critic previews, which is never a good sign for any film and is a worse sign than normal for this particular one. And the behind the scenes stuff that’s coming out thanks to Rolling Stone is illuminating, too:

One person familiar with the production estimated that some two-thirds of the crew members who worked on the film in New York had requested not to have their names formally credited on the documentary. A separate person who will be credited on the film said that, after experiencing the first year of Trump’s second term, they now wish they had not put their name on it. “I’m much more alarmed now than I was a year ago,” that person said.
People who worked on the film said they had fewer problems working with Melania Trump herself, who was described as friendly and very engaged in the process, than they did with the director, Brett Ratner. (“She was totally nice,” one person said. “She was the opposite of Brett Ratner.”) […]
“I feel a little bit uncomfortable with the propaganda element of this,” one member of the production team said. “But Brett Ratner was the worst part of working on this project.” That person said they weren’t aware of Ratner’s involvement until just days before filming began, and they would not have accepted the job if they’d known.

Ah, Brett Ratner, the accused sexual predator who hasn’t made a film since 2014 cos he fled to Israel after those accusations… sex pests look after one another, don’t they… That’s another thing putting people off, apart from the film’s subject matter… I do see some comments saying not to write it off, it could do more than the expected $5m the most optimistic prediction was suggesting; that Reagan hagiography a couple of years ago took some $30m at the box office despite the critical drubbing it got because enough of the Cult went to see it out of sacred duty. Mind you, that still wasn’t enough for that film to make a profit, and I don’t see the Melania thing achieving that either… what, $75m allegedly spent on this thing in an industry where a film usually has to bring in three or so times its cost before it’s considered a profitable success? I don’t see a documentary doing that, especially this one, even on Amazon Prime where it will soon be dumped.

But so what, really? What is $75 million to Jeff Bezos, a man with a fortune just shy of $250 billion? Small change at best, three ten-thousandths of his overall wealth. The Melania film will probably do OK on Prime, but will almost certainly never recover its costs cos the Cult isn’t that big, but Bezos will never notice and profit wasn’t the point here anyway: it was only ever a colossal suck-up to the regime, for Bezos to curry favour with Mushroom Cock, and as long as the latter has his monument that’s all that matters. I do suspect, mind you, that a large part of whatever audience the film gets will wind up being liberals hate-watching it; I just hope that, like me, if they do that, they also plan to pirate the thing rather than pay for it…

Insert Carl McCoy here

On a lighter note, Threads (which I still check out most days) has turned particularly silly in the last few hours…

So, the weather in the US has been quite foul lately, even for this time of year, and someone somewhere was inspired to develop the idea that the US “government” has engineered the weather to stop the Biblical Leviathan from awaking and to drive it back into its frozen slumber. This is FUCKING MAGNIFICENT, especially cos no one seems to know how it started nor whether (nearly wrote that as “weather” HO HO) the people who started it  mean it or not. A lot of people do seem to be invoking it sarcastically as a meme, but the funnier and sadder responses come from people not getting the joke (if it is one), e.g.:

Well, in spite of my own education (Matraville Primary 1980-86, Sydney Boys High School 1987-92, University of NSW 1993-97, and two TAFE courses 2001-03), I’ve never seen satellite imagery off the tip of Argentina/Chile before because there’s never been any reason why I SHOULD have done. I generally don’t NEED satellite imagery of anywhere, let alone the arse of South America, my interests and activities generally don’t require that sort of thing. I imagine MOST people are in a similar position to me, in that they don’t take a regular active interest in this sort of thing, but when someone shows them a cool picture like this they’ll say “oh, that’s a cool picture”, they’ll acknowledge it positively despite that… and then some prat comes up and screams at them for not being more interested in science.

Then there’s Paula here:

Here’s something else she seems to be serious about:

I think I’ll pass on that offer, thanks. At least some people are retaining their senses of irony:

And this is hard to argue with too:

As a respite from the horrors, this whole Leviathan thing certainly has been one. And, as a final note, this is also hard to argue with:

Up, up and aw-AI?

This won’t end in catastrophe at all.

The Trump administration is planning to use artificial intelligence to write federal transportation regulations, according to U.S. Department of Transportation records and interviews with six agency staffers.
The plan was presented to DOT staff last month at a demonstration of AI’s “potential to revolutionize the way we draft rulemakings,” agency attorney Daniel Cohen wrote to colleagues. The demonstration, Cohen wrote, would showcase “exciting new AI tools available to DOT rule writers to help us do our job better and faster.”
Discussion of the plan continued among agency leadership last week, according to meeting notes reviewed by ProPublica. Gregory Zerzan, the agency’s general counsel, said at that meeting that President Donald Trump is “very excited about this initiative.” Zerzan seemed to suggest that the DOT was at the vanguard of a broader federal effort, calling the department the “point of the spear” and “the first agency that is fully enabled to use AI to draft rules.”
Zerzan appeared interested mainly in the quantity of regulations that AI could produce, not their quality. “We don’t need the perfect rule on XYZ. We don’t even need a very good rule on XYZ,” he said, according to the meeting notes. “We want good enough.” Zerzan added, “We’re flooding the zone.”

There’s several hundred living human beings on any given plane flight, and I feel like settling for “good enough” in this situation could lessen their chances of making it back to the ground alive. Does Gregory want to potentially “flood the zone” with corpses? I don’t know, maybe we overstate the potential problems of this sort of thing, but then again, maybe we have to so that the problems don’t actually ensue?

I don’t want to talk about Alex Pretti, cos that’s such an unspeakable story; it was bad enough when the news started spreading before I went to bed last night and, frankly, it didn’t get any better when I got up this afternoon. I refer you instead to Wiki for a summary of things because I don’t want to have to write about it.

There was a rally at which this was taken:

And… I can’t disagree with that. I’ve said before about how much I hate that this regime has made me a worse person because I’m increasingly OK with everyone in it dying. Now I’m increasingly feeling it’s necessary that they do. It won’t end with Mushroom Cock finally popping his clogs (which I expect him to do before 2026 is over), because he will be replaced by someone probably worse. And those people will be replaced too by even worse people. I don’t see it ending except with the absolute destruction of the entire Republican party and everyone associated therewith; as long as the Republican party exists, this will continue. Abolishing ICE won’t suffice, the whole fucking party and everyone it gives a home to has to be destroyed so that it can never return. Nothing else is going to be remotely enough.

And I HATE that. I don’t WANT these pieces of shit to HAVE to die, and I don’t WANT to be happy when they do even though I’ve no doubt I will be. I don’t LIKE being this person. But it is increasingly the person I am, where I wish nothing but unspeakable evil on MAGA from Trump on down to his individual cultists. And I hate that. I hate that I can barely think of MAGA as people, cos that really just makes me as bad as them. I don’t want to say anything else for now. I’m just done, I want to get back to posting comparatively silly stuff.

I forgot to mention this…

Screenshot from Facebook a couple of weeks ago by my friend Matt who, frankly, had the best response to the news. Another friend commented that she’d heard the song and was initially convinced it was a generative AI parody, so I had to listen to it myself, and GODDAMN genAI parodies should feel insulted by that comparison. It is THAT terrible. But the album is evidently not the one he’s spent years pissing and moaning about how he can’t get a record label to release it; apparently this is another one entirely, and the idea of self-releasing the other one has never occurred to him even though Capitol Records gave back the rights to it.

Still, at least some things in Mozchester remain reassuringly the same:

When indeed!

I was never a huge fan of They Might Be Giants, at least not enough of one to actively follow their career, hence I never heard this until now. Someone posted it on Bluesky today, and just, FUCK. It is so relevant to the current moment and a certain individual that I can’t believe this song is actually fifteen years old and not actually about That Guy. It predates the full horror of That Guy by years, so much so that he wasn’t even a threat to the world at the time. And yet the question contained in that title is one that I’m sure billions of people keep asking about That Guy every day. Prophetic stuff…