You Get Fucked

This… whatever the fuck this thing is supposed to be has been causing rather a stir since it premiered at some sporting event… Superbowel? Is that the name? Something like that. Anyway, the real attraction of Superbowl is the musical interlude and the ads that debut at the event cos who gives a shit about the actual game, and this was… well, this certainly was. This is not the first time He Gets Us has played at Superbowl, but I think the grotesqueness of this year’s video has made it stand out; I actually watched the thing in an incognito window cos my Youtube recommendations are bad enough without this thing polluting them further.

So what’s the deal?

Green has elaborated on the message behind the commercials in the past, telling “The Lifestyle Podcast” in 2023 that he want to change the perception that Christians are “beginning to be known as haters”
“We are people that have the very, very best love story ever written, and we need to tell that love story,” Green explained.
“He Gets Us” ads are intended to appeal to viewers who don’t consider themselves religious or at least aren’t heavily interested in religion. The commercials intend to modernize Jesus and his message by connecting him to current world events such as racial injustice and immigration.
“We hope to remind everyone, including ourselves, that Jesus’ teachings are a warm embrace, not a cold shoulder,” the ad campaign’s website says.

This Green fellow is David Green, co-founder of Hobby Lobby, an arts & crafts company run by super-conservative Christians who run the business on “Biblical” lines, including refusing to let one of their own employees, a transgender woman, use the women’s bathroom at her place of work (leading to a legal battle that lasted over a decade which they eventually lost), denying their employees contraception, and more. If Green is concerned about Christians being perceived as haters, maybe he could, you know, not contribute to that perception.

Now, He Gets Us is a separate entity from Hobby Lobby, but not completely unconnected; it was operated by something called the Servant Foundation, which in turn is/was part of the far-right Christian legal org Alliance Defending Freedom, which is/was itself at least part-funded by something called the National Christian Foundation, which is/was in turn partly funded by something called the Illuminations Foundation that just so happened to have David Green’s son on its board. And, somewhat more directly, Green junior is also part of Come Near, the organisation that is now operating He Gets Us.

It is, accordingly, rather strange, n’est-ce pas, that such dreadful individuals should be putting so much money into this campaign that’s all about improving Jesus’ public image; and they need to have plenty of money too cos Superbowl ad slots don’t come cheap, something like seven million dollars for 30 seconds… which is why it’s odd that the video looks like it cost about seven cents to make, with these visual gibberish AI pictures strung together in a probably free video editor and synced up to a fairly bad cover of “Never Tear Us Apart” (hope INXS are satisfied with the paycheque). It’s… as dreadful as the people funding it, if aesthetically rather than politically. Mind you, the real objection to the whole thing is the fact that the campaign has a hundred million dollars behind it and this is what they’re spending it on… as opposed to, you know, actually doing good things for the poor, the have-nots, the homeless, etc. Things that could actually REALLY improve Christianity’s image.

Of course, there had to be someone attacking it from the opposite direction (via the Puzzle in a Thunderstorm FB group):

Now, though I haven’t read the entire Bible, I have read all of the New Testament more than once, and if there’s one thing I don’t recall it ever specifically mentioning, it’s abortion clinics. Consequently, I would not use the Bible as evidence for any position I might take regarding what Jesus would or would not do outside of one.

Oh, and for those interested in the actual game, Tay Tay’s team won. Which means the MAGAtrons going off about Swift being a Democrat psyop or something will be going into hyperdrive as a result.

He was indeed Damo Suzuki

The decreasing membership of Can has thinned out again with the passing of their singular vocalist Damo Suzuki… I’m reading online that he was diagnosed with cancer about ten years ago, at which time he was only given a ten percent chance of survival. I think it’s fair to say he beat those odds, at least up to now (indeed, his first go-round with cancer had been in the 80s, so he had some experience with fighting it).

Here they are on German TV not long after he got drafted into the band:

And The Fall, with Mark’s equally idiosyncratic tribute to him:

This’ll hurt you more than it’ll hurt me

The American right are gagging for a civil war right now. Just consider this guy:

Whatever it takes to return Trump back to 1600 Pennsylvania — even if it meant a civil war — would be “worth it,” according to one religious leader.
“I’ve actually had people say that if Trump was to be elected if we got a conservative Congress, that they fear that we would have another civil war,” Andrew Wommack, a TV evangelical preacher, said during an episode of his “Truth & Liberty” show earlier this week, and first reported by Newsweek. “And you know what? I don’t want a civil war, I don’t know anybody that does, but would it be worth it? To turn this nation back? I believe it would.”

So you don’t want a civil war but you do think the outcome of one would be worth it. Which means you DO want a civil war, which probably won’t affect you in the slightest (as long as it goes your way) but might fuck up millions of other lives. Mind you, he also says this:

Wommack’s embrace of a bloody clash between Americans was prompted by a viewer dialing in and asking if there could be a “grace revolution that could get the U.S. to switch out the Constitution for the Bible.”
The pastor said that the founders’ document is fine as-is. It’s those in positions of power that are asleep at the switch.
“There’s nothing wrong with our Constitution, the problem is we’re not following it,” he said.
He then went on: “If they were still writing the Bible today, I believe that the American Constitution and the founding of this nation would be in scripture as one of the great things that God has done.”

So the Constitution is fine but apparently the Bible could do with more work?

Speaking of liars…

I can’t remember the last time I heard about Jacob Wohl, one of the nastiest pieces of shit to ever do stuff on behalf of the Republican party, but I now see that’s possibly because him and his mate Jack Burkman both got sued for one of those stunts—a robocall scheme targeting black voters to convince them not to vote—and got fined five million dollars for their efforts. Now someone else is fighting back for even more:

A Marine veteran and attorney claims his life fell apart after Wohl and Burkman falsely tarred him in a 2021 video as a child sex predator, according to an $11 million racketeering lawsuit obtained by The Daily Beast.
In the aftermath, the unidentified Maryland man was let go from his law firm, lost a paid internship at Johns Hopkins University, was thrown out by his landlord, and was forced into bankruptcy, the lawsuit states. “John Doe” contends in the suit that Wohl and his co-defendant, soon-to-be-disbarred lawyer Jack Burkman, caused “irreparable harm” by laying waste to his reputation, wrecking his ability to earn a living, and turning him into a “critical casualty” of their “ongoing, illegal scheme.” […]
The complaint in Doe’s case centers around “Predator D.C.,” a low-rent web series aping NBC’s venerable true crime show, To Catch a Predator.
“We are doing hard hitting investigative journalism to expose predators in the heart of our nation’s capital,” Predator D.C.’s show page told prospective viewers, who were charged a minimum of $10 a month to tune in. “Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman conduct hidden-camera sting operations to expose predators who work within the highest levels of the U.S. Government.”

We still don’t know who this guy is, and I’d kind of love to cos I wonder why Wohl & Burkman went after him specifically. Or maybe it was just his damnable luck, I don’t know. I did think this detail was interesting:

The video also improperly described Doe as a married man, which the suit says Wohl believed “after seeing a photo of [Doe] online, in which [Doe] was wearing his Marine Corps dress blues with his wife at that time, who was African American,” the suit says.

So if they did specifically target him, did they do so because his (ex-)wife was black? I find that sadly believable… Either way, he is apparently not only a lawyer but a former Marine, so he is evidently disinclined to put up with this bullshit; apparently he turned on them in the original video and they kind of crumbled and promised not to use the footage, agreeing that he hadn’t in fact done anything wrong… except that then they did, of course, which is what led to all the ensuing trouble. I have a feeling brother Doe is going to romp home with this one…

Quelle surprise

Far-right group Project Veritas admits it had ‘no evidence’ of voter fraud in Pennsylvania

The far-right political agitator James O’Keefe and the Project Veritas organization he once led have admitted that they had “no evidence” backing up widely spread claims of voter fraud at a Pennsylvania post office during the 2020 presidential election won by Joe Biden.
O’Keefe and Project Veritas made that admission on Monday after settling a lawsuit filed against them by Robert Weisenbach, the postmaster of Erie, Pennsylvania, in state court, concluding one of the more prominent legal battles spurred by Republican lies that Donald Trump was defrauded out of another term in the White House.
“Neither Mr Weisenbach nor any other [postal] employee in Erie, Pennsylvania, engaged in election fraud or any other wrongdoing related to mail-in ballots,” O’Keefe said in a statement published on Monday on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter. “I am aware of no evidence or other allegation that election fraud occurred in the Erie post office during the 2020 presidential election.”

So, what this article is saying is that a political organisation whose whole raison d’etre was basically lying… lied. I would NEVER have thought it possible.

Kancer for the King!

So Charlie Windsor has cancer of some sort.

King Charles has been diagnosed with cancer and is already receiving treatment that will prevent him from undertaking public duties for the immediate future, Buckingham Palace has announced.
Although no further details about what type of cancer he has are being released at this stage, Buckingham Palace said it was not prostate cancer. It was discovered when the 75-year-old monarch recently underwent treatment at the London Clinic for a benign enlarged prostate.
Buckingham Palace said the king “remains wholly positive about his treatment”.
He began regular outpatient treatments on Monday, and although he has been forced to postpone public-facing engagements, he will continue with his constitutional role as head of state, including paperwork, his red boxes and private meetings.

Cue a lot of agonising over what this means for the monarchy if the king can’t actually function, who’s going to do whatever it is the royals actually do… are some of the younger ones going to have to pull their weight and actually work for once? The least helpful comment so far has surely been one I’ve seen reported as coming from Chuck’s* former press secretary, according to whom the fact that the king has cancer shows that obviously anyone can get it. WHO WOULD HAVE GUESSED? No wonder you’re his former press secretary if that’s the best you can come up with in this situation…

Anyway, I have no particular feelings on the matter other than as a somewhat remote spectacle. Whatever else happens, Charles will have the best specialists in the world and the best care that money can buy, and he will be supremely looked after. And while this whole business may well show that, hey, the obscenely rich can get cancer just as easily as you Poor People, this is also what separates him from those Poor People. He can afford to get cancer in a way lots of people can’t, cos maybe they don’t have insurance, they can’t afford not to work, they’ve got to worry about where this’ll leave the rest of the family financially, etc. To use my own mum as an example: when her cancer came back in 2012, the treatment she got involved this anti-nausea pill that, for reasons I forget now (possibly her being a pensioner), only cost here five dollars per round of three pills, but normally cost ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY DOLLARS for the same three pills for everyone else. So I obviously don’t celebrate Charles getting cancer, but it’s probably not going to be the disaster for him that it could be for others.

* At this point I initially mistyped “Chuck” as “Cuck”, for what it may be worth. I briefly debated with myself whether or not to correct it.

Occult Features of Anarchism

Book #6 for 2024. (Bit of a turnaround from Tarzan?) I’ve always been intrigued by the ways in which occult thought and politics have intertwined over the centuries, and this give a reasonably good if brief overview of how medieval millenarian and heretic movements developed through the Renaissance, eventually blossoming into Freemasonry, and the book looks at how Weishaupt’s Illuminati took that into a political and revolutionary direction and inspired umpteen other groups in the nineteenth century to follow the Masonic pattern and use Masonry to further themselves. Theosophy was apparently big among anarchists in the later 1800s. I was kind of amused to see the famous A in a circle logo actually first appeared as a compass and level in the shape of a letter A, and to see that such figure as Proudhon and Bakunin were actual Masons (the latter espousing a Spinoza-esque sort of pantheism).

This historical stuff is good although perhaps not ideal for people coming to the subject completely new, it probably helps to have some prior knowledge. Also, I’m not sure how it really all ties in with Lagalisse’s real subject, or at least the one I think she cares more about, i.e. that anarchism since the 20th century has basically tried to ignore its theological and occult underpinnings, and this is leading it down something of a dead end where they’re more interested in looking like they have what she calls “good politics” than, you know, doing actual good. Which leads to the conclusion that maybe, just maybe, we shouldn’t be so automatically dismissive of conspiracy theorists:

…purveyors of “conspiracy theories” are often from subaltern groups, so the educated activists who generally state a nominal concern to “take lead” from “those most affected” by oppression should nominally allow for the possibility that the “conspiracy theorist” may actually be offering positioned insight. Beyond “tolerating” the theorist of conspiracy for the sake of reeducating him, activists’ own ideology suggests that they might listen for subversive social commentary amid unfamiliar exposition.

They might, but that doesn’t mean they’ll necessarily gain anything useful from it. Lagalisse writes about a Zapatista who put her onto the whole conspiracy thing in the first place, and how she managed to convince him THE JOOOOOOOOOOS aren’t really running the world, but I think she got lucky with that one; I’m not sure how much seriousness she thinks we should approach these people with before we realise the exercise isn’t as edifying for them or us as she seems to think it will be.

So a mixed result, I suppose, interesting but I also don’t know how much I agree with her own arguments or how well they mesh with the historical stuff. Still, short enough that I finished it in one night, so I’ll definitely give it points for not being any longer than it was…

RIP Brother Wayne

The MC5: pioneers of wilful career suicide

Wayne Kramer from the MC5 has left the building, meaning drummer Dennis Thompson is the last man standing from that ensemble. I must confess my first thought on reading the news was an uncharitable one, in that I wondered if this meant A True Testimonial might finally get an actual release now he’s no longer there to stop it, though I do now find that court case he filed against the makers actually went against him, it just still hasn’t come out anyway… whatever. Let us watch the five in full flow back in 1970:

This was shot for a Detroit cable TV show, evidently not the full gig but damn they picked great excerpts for the program. It is probably miraculous that even these clips survive, and in very fair quality at that…

And this is them in France, late in the game (with new bassist Steve Moorhouse replacing Michael Davis’ smack habit), but still, fucking hell. The video and audio were evidently recorded on a potato, and the end result is frankly obnoxious, but at the same time it’s also a perfect artifact and presentation of this sort of rock’n’roll. It’s probably even more miraculous that this survives. I always thought the MC5’s studio records never quite matched up to the on-stage power evinced on Kick Out the Jams; they obviously needed a crowd in front of them to produce their full effect. At any rate, they outlived Hudson’s, and I’m sure that was satisfying…