Black No More

Book #2 for 2024. Danzy Senna’s introduction to the Penguin edition of Black No More helpfully notes that, in later life, author George S. Schuyler swung to the political hard right, even joining the John Birch Society (surprisingly, I find that though the latter were super far right loons, they were oddly anti-racist despite that). Having read his book, written and published while he was still an otherwise good and committed socialist, I find myself strangely unsurprised by this; Schuyler clearly had, shall we say, reservations about his fellow African Americans that, had the book been written by a white author, it would’ve been considered even in 1931 to be unnecessarily racist. But Schuyler was black and, evidently, an equal opportunity hater; white people come out of this one every bit as badly.

The premise of Black No More is that a black medical entrepreneur has developed a technique for turning black people into white people permanently (no more need for skin lightening creams and hair straightening!), and our fairly dubious “hero” takes advantage of this new technology after being spurned on New Year’s Eve by a young woman who doesn’t dance with… you know, his kind of people (the book, obviously, is a lot blunter in its language). But what happens when all the black people in America go white? What do actual white people do without them around? How can they define themselves as white people without black people to define themselves against?

The book makes for fairly bruising satire of both white and black America in the then-near future of the mid-1930s; Schuyler applies equal venom to the corruption and uselessness of black leaders as well as the way the rural white workers are taught to fear foreign and other racial influences to distract them from how capitalism is their real problem. The cynicism is quite bracing and results in a lot of delightful descriptive passages, but narratively the idea only stretches so far and I felt the book ran out of puff about halfway through (mind you, it does come to a fairly remarkable climax), as you can kind of see by some of the character names getting overtly silly (hard not to love “Dr Samuel Buggerie”, though). A fun read, but when all was said and done, I think I found it easier to admire than really like as such.

I never thought leopards would ban MY books

Everyone whines about the censoriousness of the left and the things you can’t say any more and all that, and sometimes the people doing that whining have a point, but from what I can see it’s mostly the right in the US that’s actually trying to stops books being made available, withdrawing them from libraries, etc. Including DICTIONARIES. But now Ron DeSantis’ war against the printed word has affected professional right-wing shit Bill O’Reilly:

Conservative commentator Bill O’Reilly fumed against a Florida school district’s decision to pull two of his books while officials determine whether they run afoul of a state law he supported.
Escambia County School District has at least temporarily removed more than 1,000 titles from its shelves because those books have been “alleged to contain pornography or obscene depictions of sexual conduct.” Those include O’Reilly’s Killing Jesus: A History and Killing Reagan: The Violent Assault That Changed a Presidency.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed the law in March 2022. […]
O’Reilly said he still supports the law, but added that the removal of his books is an abuse of the law.

“This will not stand!” he also gibbered on Twitter, where he has not attracted a lot of sympathy…

The worst thing, of course, is that Billo’s books will most likely be cleared, so this will just be a temporary glitch while young people are still kept safe from Anne Frank’s diary. Still, it may be temporary but I find it kind of hilarious even so, and I’m sure that somewhere Keith Olbermann is in hysterics over this story…

Monster, She Wrote

Book #1 for 2024. I did mention I was reading a Cornell Woolrich book, but that’s part of the short story per day component of this reading plan thing I’m trying; this is the first book I’ve actually finished, whereas the Woolrich volume will likely be third or maybe even fourth by the time I finish with it.

I chose this as the non-fiction book for the month of January… the title, Monster, She Wrote: The Women Who Pioneered Horror & Speculative Fiction, basically says it all; it’s a history of women authors of horror and speculative fiction from Margaret Cavendish on down to the modern day, some of whom I already knew and others I hadn’t heard of, and very few of whom I’ve actually read anything by. Kroger & Anderson are engaging guides, though I wish the book had been a bit longer and more detailed, but they do a solid job within the limits I presume the publisher imposed on them. At any rate, I’ve now got a few I should check out, and I think that once I finish the Woolrich collection I might move on to this book’s companion volume of women Weird Tales writers for my next batch of daily shorts…

Reading in 2024

Saw someone on Bluesky posit this as a bit of a reading plan for the year:

This Corey is rather more sensible than the Corey we were looking at earlier, it must be said

And this seemed… eminently possible for me, something about this just struck me as good. Cos I don’t really do plans of this sort myself, I have always said I’m too much of a mood reader for that sort of thing, but something about this seems viable for some reason. Even I could pull this off. I have been informally aiming for an average of one book a week anyway… which, to be sure, I was also aiming for last year, and, well, that didn’t exactly work out, but maybe if I actually make a post here that’ll make me more likely to stick to it. Accountability and all. I particularly like the one short story every day thing, that’s something that seems especially doable, to which end I began tonight with Mr Woolrich’s Nightwebs collection and the story “Graves for the Living”, and I think I’ll read two stories tomorrow to make up for missing Monday. Like I say, posting this here should make me more likely to stick to the plan; we’ll see how it goes, anyway…

And in the copyright office bind them

A story of genuinely remarkable stupidity:

A Lord of the Rings fanfiction writer has lost a copyright lawsuit over the publication of his own sequel to the much-loved series after opening up a counterproductive legal battle against JRR Tolkien’s estate.
The US-based author Demetrious Polychron published what he described as the “pitch-perfect” Lord of the Rings follow-up in 2022, titled The Fellowship of the King. He planned for the book to be the first of a seven-part series inspired by the franchise.
But the following April, Polychron attempted to sue the Tolkien estate and Amazon over the spin-off TV series The Rings of Power, which he claimed infringed the copyright in his book. A California court dismissed the case after the judge ruled that Polychron’s text was, in fact, infringing on Amazon’s prequel, released in September 2022.
The Tolkien estate then filed a separate lawsuit against Polychron for all physical and digital copies of The Fellowship of the King to be destroyed, as well as a permanent injunction to prevent any of the fanfiction series from being further distributed.
The US court also awarded lawyers’ fees totalling $134,000 (£106,000) to the Tolkien estate and Amazon in connection with Polychron’s lawsuit.
Making the order, Judge Wilson referred to Polychron’s original claim for copyright protection as “unreasonable” and “frivolous” given that his work is entirely based on characters in The Lord of the Rings.

This piece offers a bit more information, noting that Polychron’s book is a sequel to Tolkien’s story… which is slightly but immediately problematic when you’re claiming that Rings of Power was ripping you off, cos the latter was notably a PREQUEL to LotR. Seems that one of his gripes was the series including a character called Elanor who was OBVIOUSLY ripped off from his character of that name… but his Elanor is TOLKIEN’s Elanor, the child of Sam Gamgee. She appears right at the very end of Return of the King. He was basically going to sue Amazon and Tolkien’s estate for using characters and character names that he’d knocked off from Tolkien himself. It’d be like Brian Lumley suing H.P. Lovecraft for using Cthulhu. What a fuckwit, he deserves whatever he gets… admittedly I’m not sure how you destroy all digital copies of something, but that’ll be Polychron’s problem, not mine.

Brother 12 and a half?

There’s a Tumblr account I follow that mostly posts vintage paperback cover art in an occult vein of some sort, and today it offered something that really struck me for some reason:

Canada’s False Prophet by Herbert Emmerson Wilson, dated 1967. So who was this notorious Brother XII? Well, Wiki answers that; he appears to have been an English-born mariner called Edward Arthur Wilson who, later in life, appears to have fancied himself as the next Aleister Crowley or something… he claimed to have had some sort of vision in the south of France in 1924 which inspired him to set up his own cult; wonder if the “vision” came from hearing about Crowley’s ill-fated Abbey of Thelema in Sicily, which had just been shut down the previous year. (This piece suggests he then “channelled” the text of his book The Three Truths, which story certainly has a whiff of Liber AL to it.) Whether or not that was indeed the case, Wilson’s Aquarian Foundation seems to have gone tits up even faster than Crowley’s Abbey, from which he appears to have learned nothing about how not to screw this sort of thing up…

So what about the author of the book? Herbert Emmerson Wilson… ooh, same name as the notorious brother 12? Maybe an actual brother? Well, evidently not, per the Dictionary of Canadian Biography:

“…the fraudulent work Canada’s false prophet; the notorious Brother Twelve (Richmond Hill, Ont. [1967]), which was written by Herbert Emmerson Wilson, a convicted criminal who falsely claimed to be Edward Arthur’s brother.”

Oh.

There wasn’t much to be found online about Herbert Emmerson Wilson, but if you subtract one “m” from his middle name, you get this:

H. E. Wilson, former ordained clergyman, war veteran, bank robber, mail bandit, safe-cracker, jail breaker, convicted and sentenced murderer of his “stool-ing” partner, is without question the outstanding criminal character of the world and of the twentieth century.

Now, that comes from the website of a publisher devoted to republishing the works of one Thomas P. Kelley, a Canadian pulp writer who, among his many other works, helped Wilson write his autobiography in the 1950s. So obviously. I’m sure that description was written to hype Wilson up a bit and make him sound interesting to prospective buyers, but, remarkably enough, as far as I can see it’s actually true.

So Herbert Em(m)erson Wilson would appear to have been at least as interesting as his subject. Makes me wonder why he wrote this book about the other Wilson, then, while posing as his brother. (I am, obviously, assuming this book’s author is in fact our murderous safe-cracking ex-clergyman and the differently spelled name on the cover is the publisher’s mistake rather than being someone else with a bizarrely similar name.) Or was he? There’s a biography of Edward Wilson by John Oliphant which I haven’t read because, obviously, I only heard of him for the first time today, so I don’t know what evidence it offers, but one of the pieces I linked above indicates that his early biography is kind of sketchy and that Wilson himself claimed he was born to royalty in India.

So he was, by the look of it, not above bullshitting people. So could that English background have been part of his bullshit too and maybe him and Herbert were indeed related? At any rate, we do know he wasn’t the only Edward Arthur Wilson around at that time… maybe John Oliphant found another one? I don’t know, and somehow I suspect not, I just find the speculating interesting; after all, his reported death in Switzerland in 1934 is apparently widely considered to have been faked, maybe his birth was too. Or maybe not.

In any case, there was one more detail that amazed me as I researched this: whatever the truth of Edward Arthur Wilson, Herbert Emerson Wilson had a fan in none other than STANLEY KUBRICK, who had read Wilson’s autobiography and thought it was a great idea for a film; at the time he was working with Kirk Douglas, with whom he’d just made Paths of Glory, and offered the latter a script he called God-Fearing Man, but for whatever reason it became one of Kubrick’s many unmade projects. Until about 10 years ago when there was talk of it being made for TV by some European mob; nothing came of that but then they seem to have started talking about it again in 2019 with a view to filming it in 2020. Except we all know how that year turned out; I’m guessing this was one of the many casualties of Anno Covid… still, maybe it could yet happen?

RIP Q. Twerk

Well, there goes yet another bit of my childhood, with the Galaxy’s Greatest Comic announcing the passing of Ian Gibson. One of the defining artists at 2000AD, though he seems to have had a catastrophic falling-out with them later in life and… then THIS happened, which I don’t think I’d heard anything about before. Ian leaves a slightly more… complicated legacy than I realised…

One-Way Street

Book #13 for this year. I am well out of the habit of reading non-fiction… which, to be sure, is mostly because I’m not reading much in general (that reading slump persists) but also most of what I am reading is fiction. So a couple of considerations drove me towards this: one of my favourite Youtubers, RM Brown, did it recently for his Patreon subscriber-only thing (albeit I think he’s using the older American version, not this later one for Penguin), and I’ve owned it for nearly ten years so it’s high time that I did, probably.

Back at uni when I was doing film studies we had to get acquainted with Benjamin’s “Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”, and hitherto that’s all the Benjamin I’ve read. 30 years later, I am at least now acquainted with more of his stuff—I suppose this is best described as a “greatest hits” collection—and, frankly, uncertain what to make of it. The introduction by Amit Chaudhuri was unhelpful, and I’ll confess to coming close to not finishing the thing after I’d ploughed through the title work. I’m glad I did persist, cos I did find things of value, but it was difficult and I’m not sure how worthwhile the effort actually was… is it the sort of thing that just travels at a certain height above my head or is there actually less to it than meets the eye? I don’t know. I’m sure I would’ve got a lot more out of the essays on Proust and Kafka if I were actually familiar with them both. But a lot of the rest is kind of slow-going dense abstraction, particularly in “One-Way Street” itself, a collection of aphoristic observations that I found largely impenetrable. I don’t really feel like my time was wasted as such, but equally I’m not sure how much I got out of it.

Hard and Haight-ful

Going through one of the various Tumblr archives I’ve downloaded, I spotted this:

…and I thought it looked weirdly familiar despite never having seen it before that I could remember. It wasn’t the book that was familiar, it was the pose of the character with the guitar, and the haircut and the shades and the face. I thought I’d seen that before somewhere. And I had:

That’s George Harrison, guitarist for some band or other, making a visit to the Haight-Ashbury district with Pattie Boyd who also made it into the book cover. When I saw the cover I was curious as to when the book was published, cos it would’ve been an impossible coincidence for it to predate that photo of George (unless it was a reprint and the publisher did new art for it, which I doubt would’ve been the case somehow), and lo, a quick bit of research indicates it did indeed first appear in May 1968. So it made sense. I’m actually kind of impressed by the sheer nerve involved in taking what I presume was already a well-known and widely published photo (at least known enough by the artist to rip it off) of an international celebrity and turn it into… well, a fairly shitty cover illustration for an evidently fairly shitty piece of pornography. Presumably the publisher was confident that their target audience weren’t Beatles fans and that they were small enough that the Fabs themselves wouldn’t notice…