
Wonder how long those guys remained “Aryan” after this…

There’s been a LOT of this going around, so much so I’m just leaving this Guardian link here cos I don’t want to go over it all. Jimmy Kimmel has just been the highest profile target, by virtue of him having a TV show and all that… and if you doubted Stephen Colbert’s cancellation had some political motivation, there’s no doubt in this case, since the network was essentially threatened by the chair of the FCC:
The decision came hours after Brendan Carr, chair of broadcast regulator, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), threatened to act against ABC and its parent company Disney over the remarks.
In his monologue on Monday, Kimmel said the “Maga gang” was “desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them” and of trying to “score political points from it”.
Mr Carr said Kimmel was “appearing to directly mislead the American public”. Kimmel has not yet commented. […]
“We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” Carr, a Trump appointee, told the Benny Show, a conservative podcast.
“These companies can find ways to change conduct and take action, frankly, on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”
Hours later, Nexstar Media, one of the biggest owners of TV stations in the US, said it would not air Kimmel’s show “for the foreseeable future”.
Nexstar called his remarks about Kirk “offensive and insensitive at a critical time in our national political discourse”.
Mr Carr thanked Nexstar “for doing the right thing” and said he hoped other broadcasters would follow its lead. Nexstar is currently seeking FCC approval for its planned $6.2bn (£4.5bn) merger with Tegna.
Which I’m sure has nothing to do with their promptness to haul Kimmel off the air. The thing is, the latter said nothing about Kirk himself at all. Tyler Robinson, the suspected shooter in the incident, actually seems to be something of an enigma, in that I don’t think anyone’s actually been able to confirm where he’s at politically and thus determine motive; if the right have been trying to smear the left with him, I haven’t yet been convinced by the people on our side insisting he’s a groyper. (I know I was sniping at Nick Fuentes the other day about that, but I still need more evidence.)
I think, though, it’s pretty fair to say MAGA are trying to paint him as not of them, and it’s even fairer to say MAGA are exploiting him. In other words, this isn’t really about Kirk, it’s about the behaviour of the cult. And that’s really why he bothered them, I think. Cos what did he actually say that was wrong as such? What was misleading about it? No, it’s about the cult, and consequently about the cult leader:

You heard the man, the first amendment is dead, just like the Unhinged States itself. People who keep saying the US is “sliding into fascism” need to stop doing that, and acknowledge it’s already there. There’s no movement towards it, it’s long since taken up residence. Whatever ideas about freedom and so forth the US was founded upon are dead. And it’s only taken eight months. No wonder I didn’t write anything here for a couple of days, there’s been piss all in the discourse except that dead cunt and his Horst-Wesselisation… everything’s hideous to write about and I’m sick of it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.