Man-Made Monster (1941)

By this point in Universal’s history, Carl Laemmle and his faemmle had lost control of the studio and the new owners (including the legendary J. Arthur Rank, who was trying to expand his own business into the US) were slashing budgets. But, after the post-Production Code horror slump of the mid-30s, horror had come back onto the menu; for Man-Made Monster, the studio dusted off an old script originally intended for Lugosi and Karloff but which was deemed too similar to The Invisible Ray, and so it was handed over to one up and coming player of mostly lesser roles in lesser films (Creighton Chaney, better known as Lon Chaney Jr.) and one who was more experienced in horror and whose career was about to hit the legal skids (Lionel Atwill). What we have is a man who survives a fatal accident involving a bus colliding with an electrical pylon; Dan McCormick is a carnival performer who has somehow developed an “immunity” to electricity. This obviously attracts the interest of many people, particularly somewhat mad scientist Dr. Rigas, who suddenly has a test subject for his experiments with electricity and life. The end result is an almost ruthlessly efficient B film, costing less than $90,000 and running just a few seconds under an hour, but it generally feels pretty well-proportioned and paced; quite handsomely filmed and generally made with care, and Lionel Atwill makes the most of his part (particularly the climactic lab scene). The real beneficiaries of the film, though, were Chaney and director George Waggner; though the film wasn’t a mega hit, Universal brass were happy enough with the film to team them up again on The Wolf Man in 1941 (and give Waggner twice as much money to make it with). As the film’s Wiki page notes, though, perhaps the most fascinating outcome of the whole project was that it eventually helped lead to the formation of American International Pictures…

I can’t believe it’s not compulsory

Nazi flags can fly in Utah schools, but not pride flags, GOP lawmaker says

An ongoing fight in Utah to ban pride flags in schools entered new territory Thursday after Rep. Trevor Lee proposed new legislation to ban the flags not just in public schools, but in any government building or on any government property.
The bill, HB0077, originally applied only to schools. But an update to the bill released ahead of Thursday’s House Education Committee hearing expands the ban to all government buildings or property. The updated bill was favorably recommended by the committee, with the committee’s two Democrats — Reps. Sahara Hayes and Carol Moss — casting the only “nays.” It will now be heard on the full House floor.
Approved flags for display in government buildings and schools would include the Utah state and U.S. flags, military flags, flags for other countries, flags for Native American tribes and official flags for colleges and universities. The bill also allows for the flying of a “historic version of a flag … that is temporarily displayed for educational purposes,” which Lee, R-Layton, said would include the Confederate and Nazi flags.

Sure, why not. Give the current regime, the Hakenkreuz will probably be available for more than just temporary educational purposes. Having said which:

In a phone call Thursday night, Lee disputed that he ever said a Nazi flag could be displayed, and argued that would not be allowed under his bill.
”There is a difference between displaying flags in curriculum when you’re teaching on them,” he said. “You don’t censor history here. That’s not what we’re doing.”

No, of course not, what you’re ACTUALLY censoring is queer people. Also, this is Utah we’re talking about; covering up inconvenient historical details and lying about them is something the LDS Church has always been good at. So don’t come it with me, Trevor. I may not have much knowledge of Mormon history compared to some actual experts, but even I know that much about them…

“Avoid”?

Wow, THAT was hopeful, wasn’t it? Not even a week after being picked as our man at next year’s Biennale, Khaled Sabsabi just got dropped:

It appears that Australia’s federal arts body Creative Australia, who picked Sabsabi alongside curator Michael Dagostino, have responded to political pressure to drop the artist. In a statement they said: “The board of Creative Australia has made the unanimous decision not to proceed with the artistic team chosen for the Venice Biennale 2026. Creative Australia is an advocate for freedom of artistic expression and is not an adjudicator on the interpretation of art. However, the board believes a prolonged and divisive debate about the 2026 selection outcome poses an unacceptable risk to public support for Australia’s artistic community and could undermine our goal of bringing Australians together through art and creativity.”
The decision comes after the issue made its way to the Australian Senate. During question time, Liberal senator Claire Chandler raised Sabsabi’s selection, saying: “With such appalling antisemitism in our country, why is the Albanese government allowing the person who highlights a terrorist leader in his artwork to represent Australia on the international stage?”

Yeah, this is some bullshit. I don’t know if Sabsabi’s art is any good or not, but this certainly feels like political considerations—and I’ve no doubt Sabsabi’s views about Palestinians (he’s in favour of them) are among them—have outweighed all others. The really bothering thing, of course, is that they’ve clearly taken this decision because of conservative political criticism, Murdoch media being as much of a political entity as the Coalition of course, and the latter are still in opposition. They’re not actually in power. I have a terrible feeling that will change in May when the election rolls around, but for now they’re out of power. And Creative Australia—the former Australia Council, and part of the government’s arts portfolio and, consequently, currently overseen by the ALP—appear to have caved into them anyway. I’ve seen quite a few folk posting about “complying in advance” online, warning against giving into fascism before Mushroom Cock or Edolf (depending on which one’s actually running the country at any given moment) (and yes, Edolf is a marvellous name I saw on Threads and need to use more) can even give the order to do the fascist thing. This feels a bit like that somehow. Like CA are expecting Dutton to win in May and they’re trying to get on his side early.

Anyway, whatever “divisive debate” they were trying to avoid doesn’t matter, cos the situation has already turned into a string of resignations and a staff walkout and what I presume is gloating by The Oz; I don’t know cos I haven’t found a way around their paywall and wouldn’t want to give them the clicks anyway. And CA is pretty badly damaged. Ugly all round.

Not satire

GOP lawmaker proposes renaming Greenland ‘Red, White, and Blueland’

Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) introduced a new bill this week aiming to rename Greenland to “Red, White, and Blueland,” as President Trump seeks to acquire the island territory.
The legislation, called the “Red, White, and Blueland Act of 2025,” directs Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to oversee the implementation of the name change and to ensure official documentation and maps refer to Greenland by its updated name.
The legislation also authorizes Trump to enter into negotiations with Denmark “to purchase or otherwise acquire Greenland.”
“America is back and will soon be bigger than ever with the addition of Red, White, and Blueland,” Carter said in a statement Tuesday, after introducing the legislation.
“President Trump has correctly identified the purchase of what is now Greenland as a national security priority, and we will proudly welcome its people to join the freest nation to ever exist when our Negotiator-in-Chief inks this monumental deal,” he added.
Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in purchasing Greenland, a semi-autonomous country that is currently under Denmark’s control. He has argued that the U.S. taking over the Arctic island is necessary for national security purposes.

Not satire.

You perhaps understand why I take so little pleasure in recording political stuff here these days, cos it’s just SO FUCKING STUPID. Honestly, I lose IQ points every time one of these stupid cunts opens his mouth. But this is, quite possibly, the stupidest one yet; I mean, Mushroom Cock’s baffling desire to annex Greenland is one thing but this… I don’t have words any more.

Mamba (1930)

Tiffany Productions is usually considered part of the “Poverty Row” mob, turning out B films and programmers, but if so it was one that had at least some pretensions to move into the bigger leagues; they had their first part-talkie out in 1928 before almost any other non-major Hollywood studio, and then they made this, not only an all-talkie but a colour one at that. Astonishingly, they also apparently planned to make it in 3D as well, though that ultimately proved a step too far for Tiffany, which would go through quite remarkable hell on Mamba, with the budget blowing out to half a million dollars (about five times their usual) and a certain stock market crash occurring right in the middle of production. Still, once it was all over, Tiffany had the world’s first all talking and all-colour dramatic film (its handful of predecessors had all been musicals).

That seems to be the main reason Mamba is still remembered now, and all things being equal its continued existence and rediscovery—here in Australia, remarkably enough—is probably down to that too. In and of itself, the film offers some kind of creaky melodrama, set in a town on the border of German East Africa and the British East Africa Protectorate just before the outbreak of a certain world war in the last third of the film. The titular character is a scuzzy but rich German landowner, August Bolte, loathed by the natives and the German military stationed at Neu Posen; money can’t buy him respect though it does buy him marriage into German aristocracy, but when war breaks out his money’s not going to get him out of that. All of this culminates in a pretty remarkable climax when the natives use the outbreak of the war, and the distraction this causes the German and British soldiers, to rise up and try to wipe them out.

So yeah, very much of its time (especially when it comes to racial attitudes) and inescapably an early talkie albeit not quite as stiff as some (and some surprising violence; the Production Code would soon put an end to such overt bloodshed); a lot of the film is actually shot outdoors which you didn’t often get with early Technicolor productions, and apparently some of the outdoor sets built at Universal are still in use nearly 100 years later. I don’t think Mamba is exactly a rediscovered masterpiece but I’m still happy that it’s back among the living after decades of absence. Plus the blu ray offers a nice commentary by Brian Trenchard-Smith, of all people, which among other things handily points out the film’s numerous Code violations (like the miscegenation subplot) that give it extra flavour…

The mystery of the mystery of life

I saw this posted on Tumblr and it got me intrigued:

This is an ad for an apparently lost film called The Mystery of Life that came out in 1930. I also found this poster for it on IMDB:

But, to be honest, it’s the ad that interests me more, cos that makes the film sound, frankly, like a nudist film… but with dinosaurs? Cos I know nudist films were a thing even that early in the game, they may not have really taken off until the ’60s but they were around by the 20s. And I can kind of envisage a film like that masquerading as a serious documentary about evolution (which this purports to be) in the later manner of “white coaters”. The thing that perplexes me, though, isn’t even the presence of Clarence Darrow, which actually would kind of make sense in a film about evolution (the Scopes trial having been just a few years before), it’s the fact that Universal evidently distributed it.

The actual production company was one Classic Pictures, whose sole IMDB credit is this thing, so they must’ve sold it to Laemmle… which is the detail that puzzles me. The new enforcement of the Production Code from 1934 onwards drove this sort of production semi-underground to independent exploitation companies that weren’t signed up to the Code, and I feel like Classic Pictures could’ve been one of these dodgy mobs… but then selling it to an actual Hollywood major for distribution? I can’t imagine Universal in 1930 or ’31 being interested in a probably shitty nudist exploiter… Assuming, of course, that it was in fact a shitty nudist exploiter. I’m basing all of this on the assumption that it was, in fact, what that ad seems to be selling it as. Maybe it was a perfectly respectable and artistic film. I suspect not, but maybe I’m wrong. We don’t seem to have the film any more to tell us what it actually was.

But the dinosaurs. I think that’s ultimately what REALLY drew me to this ad. Drama in the nude? Cool! Clarence Darrow? Fine! FUCKING DINOSAURS? What the Christ were they doing in an apparent nudist film? And co-existing with humans? Apparently the theme was too “delicate” for kids to see the film cos they wouldn’t understand it, but I feel like the artist (or possibly the filmmaker) didn’t exactly understand it either…

Now I wanna be your god?

So here’s me browsing through some pictures I’ve downloaded to pick some out for the Important Images department, and I come across this:

Hmmmmmm, says I. I don’t know what the squiggly graphic is, nor who the young lady might be, but that male character at bottom right looks oddly like Iggy Pop…

..and that would be, evidently, because it IS Iggy Pop. I don’t know why but I was put in mind of this photoshoot of this early 1971 incarnation of the band, with messrs S. Asheton, Recca, R. Asheton and Williamson lurking menacingly behind Mr. Osterberg who appears to be attempting jazz hands but can’t get quite get them upright. Wonder how he ended up on the cover of this thing? Did the illustrator somehow see this particular photo and think Iggy looked like he was doing some sort of magical gesture or something? Cos I know Iggy was experimenting with a bunch of things at that time, but I never thought the occult was one of them…